Peter Edwards wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
free space!
[ ... ]
The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed
equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available
(CC's trimmed, I'm sure I'm boring people at this stage.)
Peter Edwards wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes
of
free space!
[ ... ]
The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has
Bruce Evans wrote:
I just got around to testing the patch in that reply:
[ ... ]
This seems to work. On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc
disk (**):
Try it again. This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve
as the root user, and see what the client machine reports.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I disagree.
The intent of the negative number from df is to subtract the amount
used from the total amount available, in order to get the amount
remaining.
I just don't see how you can possibly infer from the NFS spec that
abytes is anything other than an
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
I just got around to testing the patch in that reply:
[ ... ]
This seems to work. On a 2TB-epsilon ffs1 file system (*) on an md malloc
disk (**):
Try it again. This time, take the remote FS below its free reserve
as the
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
...
I just got around to testing the patch in that reply:
...
Your patch to nfs_vfsops won't apply to my Solaris kernel :-)
The protocol says abytes is unsigned, so the server shouldn't be lying
by sending a huge
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
Bernd Walter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed
equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without
the knowledge of the underlying filesystem on
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Peter Edwards wrote:
The NFS protocols have unsigned fields where statfs has signed
equivalents: NFS can't represent negative available disk space ( Without
the knowledge of the underlying filesystem on
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
free space!
enigma# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
rot13:/mnt2 56595176 54032286 18014398507517260 0%
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
free space!
enigma# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 12:54:18AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 06:44:25PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 06:04:00PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
...my sparc machine reports that my i386 nfs server has 15 exabytes of
free space!
enigma# df -k
14 matches
Mail list logo