Re: arm64 vs. jemalloc and swapping in and out, sh/su examples: being swapped out leads to later Failed assertion: "tsd_booted" after being swapped in

2017-02-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <41a51b66-4290-48e0-a3e3-aeb809b27...@dsl-only.net>, Mark Millard writes: >The evidence is that process-memory is trashed and so likely continued >operation of any previously swapped-out processes is unreliable. I can confirm process corruption on RPi3 as of r313567. --

Re: arm64 vs. jemalloc and swapping in and out, sh/su examples: being swapped out leads to later Failed assertion: "tsd_booted" after being swapped in

2017-02-27 Thread Mark Millard
On 2017-Feb-27, at 7:21 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > [I've added a variant of this material to bugzilla 217138.] > > I've reduced the testing context to the following > type of example (no longer involving buildworld > buildkernel): > > # sh > # sh > # sh > . . . > # sh > >