On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:37:47 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2018, at 11:43, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
>> I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build
>> failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:08:58 + David Chisnall wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2018, at 17:00, Jan Beich wrote:
>> It wouldn't help (see below). Clang 6 accidentally made __atomic* work
>> enough to satisfy configure check but not for the port to build. I guess,
On 15 Jan 2018, at 11:43, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote:
>
> I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build
> failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same errors,
> about missing intrinsic symbols related to __atomic_*
>
> The clang
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 10:08 AM, David Chisnall
wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2018, at 17:00, Jan Beich wrote:
> >
> > It wouldn't help (see below). Clang 6 accidentally made __atomic* work
> > enough to satisfy configure check but not for the port to build. I
On 15 Jan 2018, at 17:00, Jan Beich wrote:
>
> It wouldn't help (see below). Clang 6 accidentally made __atomic* work
> enough to satisfy configure check but not for the port to build. I guess,
> it also confuses configure in net/librdkafka and net-mgmt/netdata.
>
Can we
Tijl Coosemans writes:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:43:44 +0100 Luca Pizzamiglio
> wrote:
>
>> I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build
>> failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same errors,
>> about missing
On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:43:44 +0100 Luca Pizzamiglio
wrote:
> I've already received a couple of messages from pkg-fallout about build
> failure on head-i386-default [1] [2] both pointing to the same errors,
> about missing intrinsic symbols related to __atomic_*
>
> The