On 23 September 2018 at 07:31, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> Using this patch I was able to build/install world and kernel on an i386
> system.
> However, after removing it, I can't build world then. When trying to compile a
> kernel "the old way" I end up with:
>
> tuexen@head:~/head/sys/i386/conf %
Resending from correct address...
> On 22. Sep 2018, at 05:57, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> Hmmm, what does make -V LINKER_TYPE and make -V LINKER_FEATURES say?
>
> They look good for me, but the only way you get this error is if they are
> wrong.
>
> Although from your typescript, I see:
>
> ===>
On 9/21/18 10:10 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 9/21/18 10:00 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> That may be the issue... Does the patch I included help? I'm building now
>> on my stable system, but it's slow...
>
> It does seem to have got further this time, so a cautious yes.
I can change that to a
One thing that may allow progress is explicitly passing the path to a
new enough linker to make.
In the past when some I encountered a similar problem (I use
amd64-xtoolchain-gcc, amd64-gcc, and binutils for toolchain, and due
to some miscommunication the wrong linker was selected automatically),
On 9/21/18 10:00 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> That may be the issue... Does the patch I included help? I'm building now
> on my stable system, but it's slow...
It does seem to have got further this time, so a cautious yes.
--
Rebecca
___
On 9/21/18 9:57 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> Hmmm, what does make -V LINKER_TYPE and make -V LINKER_FEATURES say?
>
> They look good for me, but the only way you get this error is if they
> are wrong.
bcran@cube:~/workspace/freebsd % make -V LINKER_TYPE
bfd
bcran@cube:~/workspace/freebsd % make -V
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:59 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 9/21/18 9:57 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > Hmmm, what does make -V LINKER_TYPE and make -V LINKER_FEATURES say?
> >
> > They look good for me, but the only way you get this error is if they
> > are wrong.
>
>
>
Hmmm, what does make -V LINKER_TYPE and make -V LINKER_FEATURES say?
They look good for me, but the only way you get this error is if they are
wrong.
Although from your typescript, I see:
===> lib/libc (cleandir)
make[4]: "/usr/home/bcran/workspace/freebsd/lib/libc/Makefile" line 26:
amd64 libc
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:34 PM Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:30 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/18 9:09 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:02 PM Rebecca Cran via freebsd-toolchain <
>> > freebsd-toolch...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 9/21/18
On 9/21/18 9:34 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> What does ld.lld say?
>
> However, it shouldn't matter: we don't build libc until *AFTER* we
> build ld.lld, so this error is bogusly triggering. I suspect that it
> needs to be limited to only building targets, since tree traversal
> ones, as well as
On 9/21/18 9:35 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> I meant to add, can you give a few lines before the error is spewed
> here in email? My IRC computer died before I could see any answers
> there...
>
> My 11.2-stable system has 6.0.1, so I can't test from there.
I've uploaded the full 'buildworld'
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:30 PM Rebecca Cran wrote:
> On 9/21/18 9:09 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:02 PM Rebecca Cran via freebsd-toolchain <
> > freebsd-toolch...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 9/21/18 4:06 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >>>
On 9/21/18 9:09 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:02 PM Rebecca Cran via freebsd-toolchain <
> freebsd-toolch...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> On 9/21/18 4:06 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17279 for anyone else that would like to
>>> review.
>>
>> Is that
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 9:02 PM Rebecca Cran via freebsd-toolchain <
freebsd-toolch...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 9/21/18 4:06 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >
> > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17279 for anyone else that would like to
> > review.
>
>
> Is that possibly related to the error I'm getting
On 9/21/18 4:06 PM, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17279 for anyone else that would like to
> review.
Is that possibly related to the error I'm getting trying to build
-CURRENT on 11.2?
make[4]: "/usr/home/bcran/workspace/freebsd/lib/libc/Makefile" line 26:
amd64 libc
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 04:37:08PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 21 September 2018 at 15:31, Mark Johnston wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps the following? It's not quite right since it'll still use
> > -zifunc-noplt with an external LLVM toolchain, but I can't seem to
> > figure out how to define a linker
On 21 September 2018 at 15:31, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> Perhaps the following? It's not quite right since it'll still use
> -zifunc-noplt with an external LLVM toolchain, but I can't seem to
> figure out how to define a linker feature for only non-cross toolchains.
> In any case, we're going to
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 02:54:04PM -0400, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 21 September 2018 at 01:59, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
> wrote:
> > In looking into another report about using devel/amd64-gcc to buld
> > head I tried a build of -r338675 ( with WERROR= ). It got:
> >
> ...
> >
> > Question:
On 21 September 2018 at 01:59, Mark Millard via freebsd-toolchain
wrote:
> In looking into another report about using devel/amd64-gcc to buld
> head I tried a build of -r338675 ( with WERROR= ). It got:
>
...
>
> Question:
>
> Is ignoring "-z ifunc-noplt" a problem for using what
> is built?
19 matches
Mail list logo
