Surely you could trace the X11 IPC in dtrace or something, and see
what the actual messages are?
(Surely there's X11 protocol profiling stuff out there?)
Adrian
On 28 July 2011 10:12, Sean C. Farley s...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 00:48),
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org:
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether that's the case or not?
Use truss(1) for
On Wed Jul 27 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether
2011/7/27 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO
2011/7/27 Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org:
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org:
On Wed Jul 27 11, René Ladan wrote:
2011/7/27 Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb
On (27/07/2011 09:18), Alexander Best wrote:
On Wed Jul 27 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk
On Wed Jul 27 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 09:18), Alexander Best wrote:
On Wed Jul 27 11, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian
On Wed, 27 Jul 2011, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (27/07/2011 00:48), Alexander Best wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether that's the
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether that's the case or not?
Use truss(1) for instance.
However, unless there are *practical*
Again, if it's doing lots of mmap based IO, it's likely not a big deal.
Try getting dtrace to give you useful info?
Adrian
On 27 July 2011 08:48, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether that's the case or not?
adrian
On 25 July 2011 05:25, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
i noticed that chromium, expecially in combination with
Am 25.07.2011 09:21, schrieb Alexander Best:
On Mon Jul 25 11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
how can i check, whether that's the case or not?
Use truss(1) for instance.
However, unless there are *practical* problems, a high number of page
faults is not an
Same here.
I have no way of sending my dump as I'm leaving for OScon and have no access to
my desktop, but I did see this behavior.
I'm also running HEAD on amd64.
Cheers,
Norberto
On Jul 24, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
hi there,
i noticed that chromium, expecially in
Am 24.07.2011 23:25, schrieb Alexander Best:
hi there,
i noticed that chromium, expecially in combination with nspluginwrapper and
flash, is causing a lot of I/O faults. i ran 'top -mio -I -n 99' and after
It's causing page faults, which is a massive difference.
only ~ 4 hours of
Is it perhaps doing disk IO using mmap?
adrian
On 25 July 2011 05:25, Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org wrote:
hi there,
i noticed that chromium, expecially in combination with nspluginwrapper and
flash, is causing a lot of I/O faults. i ran 'top -mio -I -n 99' and after
only ~ 4
18 matches
Mail list logo
