Re: ffsinfo missing in 5.1-RELEASE
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Robert Watson wrote: The only problem with this patch is that we lose the ability to do the START BLOCK SUMMARY AND POSITION TABLE display for UFS1. I'm not sure this is a big issue; I will go ahead and commit it with those #ifdef'd out (rather than removed as is the case in the patch) and look for advice on reintroducing them from someone with more UFS expertise than me. Robert, I'll have a look at it once it's back in the tree, maybe I find out what to do about it. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ffsinfo missing in 5.1-RELEASE
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Robert Watson wrote: The only problem with this patch is that we lose the ability to do the START BLOCK SUMMARY AND POSITION TABLE display for UFS1. I'm not sure this is a big issue; I will go ahead and commit it with those #ifdef'd out (rather than removed as is the case in the patch) and look for advice on reintroducing them from someone with more UFS expertise than me. I'll have a look at it once it's back in the tree, maybe I find out what to do about it. It's in my commit queue for today, so hopefully that opportunity will come quickly :-). I haven't managed to track down much about cg_blks() yet -- it disappeared with UFS2 coming in, so it will probably just take checking out an older tree and pushing it forward again for UFS1 dumping. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ffsinfo missing in 5.1-RELEASE
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: I just used growfs (nice tool btw) and noticed that growfs(8) has a reference to ffsinfo(8). But neither ffsinfo(8) nor the binary are present on my 5.1 System. I already submitted a PR bin/53517, which has a patch that repairs ffsinfo on -CURRENT. regards, le -- Lukas Ertl eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UNIX Systemadministrator Tel.: (+43 1) 4277-14073 Vienna University Computer Center Fax.: (+43 1) 4277-9140 University of Vienna http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/~le/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ffsinfo missing in 5.1-RELEASE
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: On Wed, 13.08.2003 at 14:32:32 +0200, Lukas Ertl wrote: I just used growfs (nice tool btw) and noticed that growfs(8) has a reference to ffsinfo(8). But neither ffsinfo(8) nor the binary are present on my 5.1 System. I already submitted a PR bin/53517, which has a patch that repairs ffsinfo on -CURRENT. Mr Burns Excellent! /Mr Burns Sorry for the noise. The only problem with this patch is that we lose the ability to do the START BLOCK SUMMARY AND POSITION TABLE display for UFS1. I'm not sure this is a big issue; I will go ahead and commit it with those #ifdef'd out (rather than removed as is the case in the patch) and look for advice on reintroducing them from someone with more UFS expertise than me. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Associates Laboratories ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
