Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
Regards!
--
Niclas
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm ${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
Regards!
Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD
9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected.
I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated
gcc 4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present.
By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG.
Oliver
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
2011/8/14 Hartmann, O. ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de:
On 08/14/11 11:48, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is
generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking
for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it
with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm
${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
Regards!
Just got a notebook, build with the old gcc 4.2 of the system FreeBSD
9.0/amd64 -r224579: portsnap works as expected.
I will build a most recent system on that box (with systems's outdated gcc
4.2) and I'll report if the problem is still present.
By the way: My boxes of failure are all built with CLANG.
Oliver
Trying again today, with my 9.0-BETA1 amd64 box built with clang.
Not the same error, but the same kind when using portsnap extract :
/usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript-Value-Escape/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-JavaScript/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-List-MoreUtils/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-Modern-Perl/
/usr/ports/lang/p5-POE-Component-Hailo/
files/b54a58da6d23d31f19a9105f70af03ef797aba8db6bdbc03d6deb72e62011d56.gz
not found -- snapshot corrupt.
This file is not present in /var/db/portsnap/files/.
# ll /var/db/portsnap/files/ | wc -l
22862
This was after removing /var/db/portsnap/files/ and
/var/db/portsnap/t* and a fresh portsnap fetch, on the portsnap5
mirror.
# fetch
http://portsnap5.freebsd.org/s/c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz
# tar tf c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz
| grep b54a58
nothing...
I tried on portsnap2 and the file was not present in
c9a2c992e8bde0c98309f76a0ecfb00eb76558c7c3dcbd0405a88316b775e66b.tgz
--
Olivier Smedts _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X
www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \
Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is
generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking
for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm
${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
same here:
/usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
/usr/ports/databases/godis/
files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.
Regards!
--
Niclas
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
2011/8/14 Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org:
On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is
generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking
for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it
with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm
${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
same here:
/usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
/usr/ports/databases/godis/
files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.
Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* :
# svn log -v -r224842
r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 aoû 2011) | 10 lignes
Chemins modifiés :
M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c
When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(),
a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode
open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to
dupfdopen(). This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}. Fix
by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is
still available.
Approved by:re (kib)
Reported by:cognet
You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can
buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap
after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I
did it).
--
Olivier Smedts _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X
www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \
Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
On Sun Aug 14 11, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/8/14 Alexander Best arun...@freebsd.org:
On Sun Aug 14 11, Niclas Zeising wrote:
On 2011-08-13 12:08, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 09:51:41AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote:
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the
permissions et cetera OK?
Roland
No, it does not.
What I did so far over night:
I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again.
Again failure.
After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports).
Everything seems
all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a
non-portsnap-created /usr/ports
and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very
same failure:
(portsnap fetch extract:)
/usr/ports/devel//
/usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/
/usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/
/usr/ports/devel/cdash/
files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz
not
found -- snapshot corrupt.
I've been looking at the portsnap shellscript. This error message is
generated
by the shell's built-in test command, specifically '[ -r'. It is looking
for a
file that was extracted with tar. So the place to look for the bug is IMO
1) the portsnap script itself (differences between 8.2 and 9?)
2) the sh(1)'s built-in test command (ditto)
3) tar (ditto)
When you run 'portsnap fetch' it downloads a tgz archive and unpacks it
with
tar(1). What you could try is to comment out the line 'rm
${SNAPSHOTHASH}.tgz'
in portsnap, and test if the tgz file extracts differently using an
8.2-RELEASE tar and the 9-CURRENT tar. If so, that would be a bug!
Roland
Just a me too!. It happens for me on a recently updated 9-current
virtual machine, built with clang.
same here:
/usr/ports/databases/gigabase/
/usr/ports/databases/godis/
files/39644d98f9e9b9d9a362cbfc075a996683e8a611a4362d883247c9a2e2fa2658.gz
not found -- snapshot corrupt.
running r224841 on amd64 built with base clang.
Aparently fixed with latest HEAD *kernel* :
# svn log -v -r224842
r224842 | rwatson | 2011-08-13 18:03:40 +0200 (sam 13 aoû 2011) | 10 lignes
Chemins modifiés :
M /head/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c
When falloc() was broken into separate falloc_noinstall() and finstall(),
a bug was introduced in kern_openat() such that the error from the vnode
open operation was overwritten before it was passed as an argument to
dupfdopen(). This broke operations on /dev/{stdin,stdout,stderr}. Fix
by preserving the original error number across finstall() so that it is
still available.
Approved by:re (kib)
Reported by:cognet
You won't be able to buildworld with the buggy kernel, but you can
buildkernel and reboot on the new kernel. No problems with portsnap
after that (don't know if you have to clean the old portsnap files, I
did it).
thanks. switching to a newer revision alone didn't solve the issue. however
after doing
rm -r /var/db/portsnap/files/; rm /var/db/portsnap/t*; portsnap fetch update
everything's back to normal. :)
--
Olivier Smedts _
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
e-mail: oliv...@gid0.org - against HTML email vCards X
www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \
Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde :
ceux qui comprennent le binaire,
et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt.
On 08/13/11 09:26, Roland Smith wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: On 08/12/11 22:54, Roland Smith wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz Does this file actually exist if you extract the snapshot? And are the permissions et cetera OK? Roland No, it does not. What I did so far over night: I deleted /var/db/portsnap as well as /usr/ports/. Then I tried again. Again failure. After that it got the ports tree via CVS (make update in /usr/ports). Everything seems all right. I tried portsnap again. portsnap compalins about a non-portsnap-created /usr/ports and please me to use 'extract'. I do ... but then I run into the very same failure: (portsnap fetch extract:) /usr/ports/devel// /usr/ports/devel/ccdoc/ /usr/ports/devel/ccrtp/ /usr/ports/devel/cdash/ files/dd7c394c9c9ddf4b97f1b14c676f370adc259b2c7a4b8346eba0788a431db398.gz not found -- snapshot corrupt. Oliver ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
