Re: g++ problem

2003-11-07 Thread Christoph P. Kukulies
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:28:28AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) C. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to compile a virus-scanner for Linux that allows for scanning Windoze PCs in a network for all sorts of recent viruses (RPC/DCOM and

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:19:53AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote: Clearly. :-) I should have mentioned that it is not in the Makefile or in variables defined through /etc/make.conf. (I was using gmake for this). It seems to be wired somewhere else. There just aren't many possibilities

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) C. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to compile a virus-scanner for Linux that allows for scanning Windoze PCs in a network for all sorts of recent viruses (RPC/DCOM and such). http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/doscan Compilation fails with

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:28:28AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) C. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried to compile a virus-scanner for Linux that allows for scanning Windoze PCs in a network for all sorts of recent viruses (RPC/DCOM and

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:44:59 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This happens with g++ 3.x ... This will happen with g++ 3.x, 2.x, 1.x and future 4.x too. I.e. the GCC is not at fault and the subject of the original message is misleading. -- Alexander Kabaev

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Harti Brandt
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Marius Strobl wrote: MSOn Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:28:28AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: MS On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 16:55:00 +0100 (CET) MS C. Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MS MS I tried to compile a virus-scanner for Linux that allows for scanning MS Windoze PCs in a network

Re: g++ problem

2003-11-06 Thread Marius Strobl
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 11:51:12AM -0500, Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 17:44:59 +0100 Marius Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This happens with g++ 3.x ... This will happen with g++ 3.x, 2.x, 1.x and future 4.x too. I.e. the GCC is not at fault and the subject of the original