It seems David Leimbach wrote:
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
supported
by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release ISOs
that
will include drivers not included in the default
On Friday, June 6, 2003, at 08:53 AM, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
It seems David Leimbach wrote:
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
supported
by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release
ISOs
It seems dave wrote:
It seems David Leimbach wrote:
So... I have this nice SATA drive and controller which I believe is
supported
by FreeBSD but not in the default build for releases.
What is the best way to cross-build a version of FreeBSD's release
ISOs
that
will include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 June 2003 14.21, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
Get me a 3112 based controller on my desk :)
If this is an option, let me know what make and model you would need and I
will make sure we get a sponsor for such a controller from the sponsor of
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
:On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
: On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
: It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix
: (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326).
* Szilveszter Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] escriuréres
Everything works great with the fix.
Which exposes another interesting problem.
If I issue 'nm -v', it says:
/usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory
If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out by
I think it may be related..
I saw this when I was sufferning from the other problemm
make sure you have the pmap fix and then re make buildworld/make
installworld when running on a new kernel and see if it goes away.
szia!
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out by default
like most other programs that deal with binaries.
If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed see that.
Thanks for the clarification, I expected it to
In the last episode (Jun 27), Szilveszter Adam said:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out
by default like most other programs that deal with binaries.
If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
I must admit that I have been less then tactful about this thread. I
apologize for this. This is my last response to this because once again
this has gone on far too long.
As far as this response goes. I sense "selective reading." I never said
do not alter /usr/src in any way.
This is definitly an election year...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerhard Sittig
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
But it could be j
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 06:47:17PM -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
It appears that I am not the only one who has seen this. Don't call this an
unsubstantiated comment... It's not just me.
I didn't quote anything else of your message because this is the obvious problem:
No one questioned if you
Tony Johnson wrote:
Since I am complaining then I need to figure out what U have done to make
5.0-CURRENT crash?? Well atleast U admit that U do not know and U do not
care. So anyone who is using FreeBSD should also not care?? This is more
screwed up then I thought and people @FreeBSD
* Tony Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000928 17:54] wrote:
I really did not want to reply to this but since some people believe that I
am just see-ing things, then I will set this straight.
No we don't Tony, we aren't claiming any stability in -current,
I'm sure people will remeber your initial
* Thomas David Rivers [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000928 03:34] wrote:
Alfred,
Just playing `devils advocate' here. But, in some initial
install situations, exactly how is the user, even the most
knowledgeable one, supposed to do much of anything if the
install itself doesn't work? Not
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 21:45 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
Since I am complaining then I need to figure out what U have
done to make 5.0-CURRENT crash?? Well atleast U admit that U
do not know and U do not care. So anyone who is using FreeBSD
should also not care?? This is more screwed up
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927 18:26] wrote:
OK
Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
crash dump before any FS's are
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas David
Rivers
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 19:54:01 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Tony Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927
D];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 19:54:01 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
On Thursday, September 28, 2000 5:33 AM, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
Alfred Perlstein [EM
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
I don't think this has much to to with the current situation: based on
the evidence we have seen, it seems that Tony has tried to boot a
release snapshot of -CURRENT. It failed. Coincidentally, he has also
disabled IDE support in the belief that
On Thursday, 28 September 2000 at 21:45:13 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
I will not provide comments as the below messages are already too
messy.
It would be nice if you'd adhere to the conventions when you reply,
however. It's much easier to understand in chronological order. I've
now had to
I will not provide comments as the below messages are already too messy.
Remove my teflon cables... Hmmm... I'll try it but something tells me that
this is like trying to shoot an arbitrary star in the midnight sky. FreeBSD
doesn't like teflon or is it just my system???
I think there have
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
mode. The problem seems to be because I have all my IDE devices turned off
in my bios. If this is the case, please undo this! That would be the
silliest reason for a kernel to
ris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:48 PM
To: Tony Johnson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting problem
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
mode. The problem seems to b
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
I don't believe the handbook covers "today's" 5.0-Current...
Why would having no bustmastering DMA IDE disk contriollers on an all-scsi
system cause a system to page fault from "today's" kern.flp mfsroot.flp
boot floppy.
Try again...
No, you try
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a page fault 12 in kernel
mode. The problem seems to be because I have all my IDE devices turned
off
in my bios. If this is the case, please undo this! That would be the
silliest reason for a
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
On Wednesday, 27 September 2000 at 19:07:17 -0500, Tony Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday, September 27, 2000 6:48 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
When I booted the 9/27/2000 (ie. today) I got a
OK
Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
crash dump before any FS's are mounted or even before I tell FBSD where to
put the crash dump, I'd really like to know this... I'd like to
* Tony Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000927 18:26] wrote:
OK
Well Here is the issue. If I put in the 2 boot floppies I get a page fault
12 after I press Q for "quit" on the visual kernel config. If I can save a
crash dump before any FS's are mounted or even before I tell FBSD where to
put the
30 matches
Mail list logo
