On 11 Oct, Bill Fumerola wrote:
#makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin
We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we
As Bruce Evans already said, It's documented.
don't need to go hunting down oddities. :
Have you seen the '#' in "#makeoptions"? I assume a '#' in
On 12 Okt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can try the patch in (my) PR 'kern/14278'.
Works.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
What do you mean, my birth certificate expired?
http://netchild.home.pages.de A.Leidinger+Home @ WJPServer.CS.Uni-SB.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option
#makeoptionsCONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin
because there is NO 'abs' function/macro in this files
(ac97.c, channel.c and mss.c) and they can be only compiled using
gcc's builtin
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Fumerola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option
#makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin
We have enough breakages with the
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we
don't need to go hunting down oddities. :
Does it mean that I throw away my PR with patches to
the 'newpcm' files which add 'abs' definition and therefore
make it
Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option
^^^
#makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin
We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we
don't