Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-12 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 11 Oct, Bill Fumerola wrote: #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we As Bruce Evans already said, It's documented. don't need to go hunting down oddities. : Have you seen the '#' in "#makeoptions"? I assume a '#' in

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-12 Thread A . Leidinger
On 12 Okt, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can try the patch in (my) PR 'kern/14278'. Works. Bye, Alexander. -- What do you mean, my birth certificate expired? http://netchild.home.pages.de A.Leidinger+Home @ WJPServer.CS.Uni-SB.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread nnd
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option #makeoptionsCONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin because there is NO 'abs' function/macro in this files (ac97.c, channel.c and mss.c) and they can be only compiled using gcc's builtin

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread nnd
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Fumerola [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin We have enough breakages with the

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Tue, 12 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we don't need to go hunting down oddities. : Does it mean that I throw away my PR with patches to the 'newpcm' files which add 'abs' definition and therefore make it

Re: kernel broken? (pcm)

1999-10-11 Thread Bruce Evans
Such an errors results from (uncommented) kernel option ^^^ #makeoptions CONF_CFLAGS=-fno-builtin We have enough breakages with the _documented_ kernel options that we don't