Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: walt wrote: My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread walt
Tim Robbins wrote: On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: walt wrote: My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-21 Thread walt
walt wrote: My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just confirmed. Does anyone else see this behavior in -CURRENT? What