Re: make -jN parallel builds is broken

2013-05-31 Thread Florent Peterschmitt
Le 31/05/2013 12:13, Andre Oppermann a écrit : Any ideas how to fix this? # make -j8 buildworld --- buildworld --- make: illegal option -- J usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile] [-I directory] [-j max_jobs] [-m

Re: make -jN parallel builds is broken

2013-05-31 Thread Andre Oppermann
On 31.05.2013 12:17, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: Le 31/05/2013 12:13, Andre Oppermann a écrit : Any ideas how to fix this? # make -j8 buildworld --- buildworld --- make: illegal option -- J usage: make [-BPSXeiknpqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-E variable] [-f

Re: make -jN bug (was: Re: groff breaks make -j N buildworld)

2001-04-19 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:38:49PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Attached is the Makefile that demonstrates the problem. Run it like this: make obj; make all Then try: make install And then try: make -j2 install

Re: make -jN bug (was: Re: groff breaks make -j N buildworld)

2001-04-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Attached is the Makefile that demonstrates the problem. Run it like this: make obj; make all Then try: make install And then try: make -j2 install Note the difference. This fixes the problem: --- Makefile Thu

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-06 Thread Bob Bishop
At 4:54 pm + 5/4/99, eagle wrote: On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: I'm running a test build at -j3 now following the reccomended ncpus +1 formula everything looks great so far. if it fails i'll let you know rob build completed successfully will experment some more Hmm. -j3 still fails

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-06 Thread David O'Brien
Hmm. -j3 still fails here, in the usual place. I haven't even started looking at the -j problem. There is still some bootstrap problem with C++ (appears to be in libstdc++). Sorry. (of course patches gladly accepted :-) ) -- -- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org) To

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-06 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Bob Bishop: Hmm. -j3 still fails here, in the usual place. Even -j2 failed here. I completed a make world at around 15H GMT (suppoed minutes before) w/o any problem and the machine is now happily running an egcs-compiled kernel. Congrats again David. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=-

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Bob Bishop wrote: World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) Nope... === cc_int make: don't know how to make insn-attrtab.c. Stop *** Error code 2 -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) I'm running a test build at -j3 now following the reccomended ncpus +1 formula everything looks great so far.

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) I'm running a test build at -j3 now following the reccomended

Re: make -jn ?

1999-04-05 Thread eagle
On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, eagle wrote: On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Bob Bishop wrote: World builds OK here now, kernel, bootblocks and all. Good job! Is `make -jn' safe yet? Could turn these test builds round a lot faster :-) I'm running a test build at -j3 now following the