Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-22 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:15 PM, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:

 On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:14:36PM -0400, Darrel wrote:
 
 Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works 
 anymore...
 -Garrett
 
 
 Thank you.
 
 Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many exceptions- the 
 steps would have been included in an OpenBSD update that required portions
 of the tree to be recompiled.
 
 
 You should always rebuild the tree in its entirety when upgrading.
 Plus, if you are running -CURRENT, you should expect some things to
 break on occasion.  While those cases are not intentional, they do
 happen.

Should is the operable word. If one does something that affects a non-niche 
group, it's a wise idea to use updating as it was supposed to be used. As it 
stands updating is neither used nor abused.
Thanks,
-Garrett___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-22 Thread Fbsd8

snip


Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a 
OpenBSD Packet Firewall that survives upgrades.  Perhaps I should just 
take all of the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use 
ipfw2.



Darrel




On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall

OpenBSD 4.5 version of PF firewall which is included with the base 
FreeBSD 8.x and 9.x releases is no longer supported by OpenBSD and very 
back level.


The most current version of OpenBSD is 5.1. PF version 5.0 changed the 
syntax of the NAT statement making PF no longer backwards compatible 
which breaks some Freebsd standard, so updated versions of OpenBSD PF 
will no longer be mass ported to FreeBSD. Any bug fix code to OpenBSD PF 
will have to be incorporated by hand into FreeBSD's version of PF from 
this point on.


The following will shine some more light on the subject.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167057

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-September/006740.html





___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-22 Thread Darrel



snip


Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a OpenBSD 
Packet Firewall that survives upgrades.  Perhaps I should just take all of 
the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use ipfw2.



Darrel




On the subject of OpenBSD Packet Firewall

OpenBSD 4.5 version of PF firewall which is included with the base FreeBSD 
8.x and 9.x releases is no longer supported by OpenBSD and very back level.


The most current version of OpenBSD is 5.1. PF version 5.0 changed the syntax 
of the NAT statement making PF no longer backwards compatible which breaks 
some Freebsd standard, so updated versions of OpenBSD PF will no longer be 
mass ported to FreeBSD. Any bug fix code to OpenBSD PF will have to be 
incorporated by hand into FreeBSD's version of PF from this point on.


The following will shine some more light on the subject.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=167057

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2012-September/006740.html




Thank you.  This information is good to know since I recompiled parts of 
Packet Firewall and then rebooted the machine with no working Packet 
Filter as a result.


I have adjusted to the changes and am running OpenBSD 5.1 on my perimeter. 
Also, I am experimenting with NPF on NetBSD, which has a few bugs but 
generally works just fine tested with 'nmap' and the like.  For FreeBSD, I 
will change to IPFW.  It might be useful anyhow, since I have a Macintosh 
and will eventually probably get another.  I would guess that the 
Macintosh firewall is still 'ipfw2', or something not too dissimilar.


There is just no sense banging my head against a wall and repearting 
mistakes that actually do not belong to me by trying to run Packet Filter 
on FreeBSD.


Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Darrel


On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Darrel wrote:




Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10?


No.





So I ran mergemaster and upgraded zpool from '28' to 'zpool-features'
and installed the new bootcode to ada0 and ada1.  The next step
needs to be right before I can reboot.

pfctl and snmp_pf need to be recompiled.  Does this mean 'make
clean', 'make', and 'make install' in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf and /usr/src/sbin/pfctl?
Is either of the directories incorrect or some other combination
of make calls required there?



I asked this on 'questions' and no one answered- perhaps they are not 
running -current.  I seem to be stuck with it now since zpool has been 
upgraded.  Is there no one on this list willing to take a moment to let me 
know if the steps in the previous paragraph which I guess are correct are 
actually correct?  The file /usr/src/UPDATING merely mentions that the 
modules should be compiled but does not describe it.


Actually, I am becoming suspicious that FreeBSD does not maintain a 
OpenBSD Packet Firewall that survives upgrades.  Perhaps I should just 
take all of the Packet Firewall stuff out of my kernel and learn to use 
ipfw2.


Mergemaster was run on Wednesday and the file server just sits there 
waiting for a couple of commands and a reboot.


Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Darrel levi...@iglou.com wrote:

Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works anymore...
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Darrel



Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works anymore...
-Garrett



Thank you.

Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many exceptions- the 
steps would have been included in an OpenBSD update that required portions

of the tree to be recompiled.

Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-21 Thread Glen Barber
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:14:36PM -0400, Darrel wrote:
 
  Welcome to the wonderful world that no one knows how UPDATING works 
  anymore...
  -Garrett
 
 
 Thank you.
 
 Assholes [ pardon me] that they tend to be, with many exceptions- the 
 steps would have been included in an OpenBSD update that required portions
 of the tree to be recompiled.
 

You should always rebuild the tree in its entirety when upgrading.
Plus, if you are running -CURRENT, you should expect some things to
break on occasion.  While those cases are not intentional, they do
happen.

Glen



pgp1D4EIb94Yt.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-19 Thread Darrel



It should be part of the checkout. Try:

man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5



found it.  :)


Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10?


No.





So I ran mergemaster and upgraded zpool from '28' to 'zpool-features'
and installed the new bootcode to ada0 and ada1.  The next step
needs to be right before I can reboot.

pfctl and snmp_pf need to be recompiled.  Does this mean 'make
clean', 'make', and 'make install' in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/bsnmpd/modules/snmp_pf and /usr/src/sbin/pfctl?
Is either of the directories incorrect or some other combination
of make calls required there?

Thanks,
Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-18 Thread Fabian Keil
Darrel levi...@iglou.com wrote:

 OpenBSD Packet Filter seems to have broken between 9.0 and 9.1, as it did 
 from 8.2 to 9.0.  I built stable/9 and it was not fixed.  Since I like to 
 run Packet Filter, I ran these commands:
 
 # cd /usr
 # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src
 
 Then I checked /usr/src/UPDATING and found this:
 
 20120828:
  A new ZFS feature flag com.delphix:empty_bpobj has been merged
  to -HEAD. Pools that have empty_bpobj in active state can not be
  imported read-write with ZFS implementations that do not support
  this feature. For more information read the zpool-features(5)
  manual page.
 
 Unfortunately, I do not have a manual page for zpool-features.

It should be part of the checkout. Try:

man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5

 Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10?

No.

Fabian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-18 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
 Darrel levi...@iglou.com wrote:

 OpenBSD Packet Filter seems to have broken between 9.0 and 9.1, as it did
 from 8.2 to 9.0.  I built stable/9 and it was not fixed.  Since I like to
 run Packet Filter, I ran these commands:

 # cd /usr
 # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src

 Then I checked /usr/src/UPDATING and found this:

 20120828:
  A new ZFS feature flag com.delphix:empty_bpobj has been merged
  to -HEAD. Pools that have empty_bpobj in active state can not be
  imported read-write with ZFS implementations that do not support
  this feature. For more information read the zpool-features(5)
  manual page.

 Unfortunately, I do not have a manual page for zpool-features.

 It should be part of the checkout. Try:

 man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5

Dumb question: why isn't this manpage installed with the rest?
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-18 Thread Yuri Pankov

On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:07:01 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Fabian Keil
freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:

Darrel levi...@iglou.com wrote:


OpenBSD Packet Filter seems to have broken between 9.0 and 9.1, as it did
from 8.2 to 9.0.  I built stable/9 and it was not fixed.  Since I like to
run Packet Filter, I ran these commands:

# cd /usr
# svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src

Then I checked /usr/src/UPDATING and found this:

20120828:
  A new ZFS feature flag com.delphix:empty_bpobj has been merged
  to -HEAD. Pools that have empty_bpobj in active state can not be
  imported read-write with ZFS implementations that do not support
  this feature. For more information read the zpool-features(5)
  manual page.

Unfortunately, I do not have a manual page for zpool-features.


It should be part of the checkout. Try:

man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5


 Dumb question: why isn't this manpage installed with the rest?


It is, but the OP only did a src checkout :-)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: manual page | zpool-features

2012-09-18 Thread Darrel


On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Fabian Keil wrote:


Darrel levi...@iglou.com wrote:


OpenBSD Packet Filter seems to have broken between 9.0 and 9.1, as it did
from 8.2 to 9.0.  I built stable/9 and it was not fixed.  Since I like to
run Packet Filter, I ran these commands:

# cd /usr
# svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head src

Then I checked /usr/src/UPDATING and found this:

20120828:
 A new ZFS feature flag com.delphix:empty_bpobj has been merged
 to -HEAD. Pools that have empty_bpobj in active state can not be
 imported read-write with ZFS implementations that do not support
 this feature. For more information read the zpool-features(5)
 manual page.

Unfortunately, I do not have a manual page for zpool-features.


It should be part of the checkout. Try:

man /usr/src/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool-features.5



found it.  :)


Does this mean that I can not update from 9 to 10?


No.



Appears as simple as running the update and 'zpool upgrade -v'.

So, I will proceed.

Darrel
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org