On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 03:02:21AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Actually, it broke fsck_ffs.
> >
> > Workaround to avoid the known broken case:
>
> The brokenness in ix86_expand_clrstr is quite visible when you
> compare the function with ix86_expand_movstr.
Fixed in rev 1.368.2.10. "*
> Actually, it broke fsck_ffs.
>
> Workaround to avoid the known broken case:
The brokenness in ix86_expand_clrstr is quite visible when you
compare the function with ix86_expand_movstr.
- Tor Egge
Index: contrib/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, I wrote:
> gcc now generates inline code for memset in some cases. Broken code.
Actually, it only generates inline code for memset in a few more cases,
and the case of a non-constant length is broken (and some cases of
constant lengths are pessimized (e.g., length 7)).
> ..
