M. Warner Losh wrote:
: - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A large
component of the decision to remove it from the base was the high
incidence of security problems with the original code. That, coupled
with the
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic install is a pain.
Has this been well debated already ? or should I file a Send-PR ?
It was moved
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic install is a pa=
in.
=20
Has this been well debated already ? or should
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:48:49AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: - Please consider restoring rdist to FreeBSD. Thanks.
:
: No thanks. It was removed almost 2 years ago because
: better alternatives are available.
And the number of security problems with rdist are legion. A
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:48:49AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:22:16PM +0100, Julian Stacey wrote:
5.0-DP2 (unlike 4.7) has no src/usr.bin/rdist - just ports/net/rdist6
=20
rdist6 is supposed to be better, but no rdist after basic
