On 09/29/2017 10:59, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:38:58 +0200
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>
>> On 09/28/2017 08:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
>>> Guido Falsi wrote:
>>>
On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:57:01 +0200
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:51:18 +0200
> Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
> > On 09/27/17 09:05, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > > On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:38:58 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 09/28/2017 08:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
> > Guido Falsi wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23
On 09/28/2017 09:38, Guido Falsi wrote:
> I'm not understanding what you are expecting us to do based on
> circumstantial and partial data.
>
I'm clarifying myself here:
I mean that I don't know what to do about this based on the data and the
details you give. What you are seeing looks normal
On 09/28/2017 08:11, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>
>> On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
>>> Guido Falsi wrote:
>>
>>> Since I run net/asterisk with
On 09/28/2017 08:01, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> These numbers really don't tell us anything. The system has anyway been
>> running for days, depending on configuration daemons like cron and ntp
>> are running and performing tasks, things are being cached and so on, so
>> that difference after three
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
> > Guido Falsi wrote:
>
> > Since I run net/asterisk with automatic module loading (I'm new to
> > asterisk),
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:23:20 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 09/27/2017 11:27, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
> > Guido Falsi wrote:
> >> But while asterisk is running does the memory usage increase unbounded
> >> till
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 12:51:18 +0200
Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 09/27/17 09:05, Guido Falsi wrote:
> > On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
> >> Guido Falsi wrote:
> >
> >> Since I run net/asterisk with
On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
> > Guido Falsi wrote:
>
> > Since I run net/asterisk with automatic module loading (I'm new to
> > asterisk),
On 09/27/17 09:05, Guido Falsi wrote:
On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
Since I run net/asterisk with automatic module loading (I'm new to asterisk),
this is very likely and might cause the problem somehow.
On 09/27/2017 11:27, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 09:05:42 +0200
> Guido Falsi wrote:
>> But while asterisk is running does the memory usage increase unbounded
>> till filling all available memory or does it stabilize at some point?
>
> As far as I could
On 09/26/2017 15:41, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
> Guido Falsi wrote:
> Since I run net/asterisk with automatic module loading (I'm new to asterisk),
> this is very likely and might cause the problem somehow.
>
You can exclude single modules
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:06:23 +0200
Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 09/26/2017 14:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Befor starting a PR I'd liek to ask for some advice to document a supposedly
> > existent memory leak in net/asterisk13 and 12-CURRENT.
> >
> > Background:
> >
> > Running
On 09/26/2017 14:45, O. Hartmann wrote:
Befor starting a PR I'd liek to ask for some advice to document a supposedly
existent memory leak in net/asterisk13 and 12-CURRENT.
Background:
Running recent 12-CURRENT (FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #58 r323999: Tue Sep 26
06:18:27 CEST 2017 amd64) on a
15 matches
Mail list logo