Re: panic: sleeping process owns a mutex

2001-05-16 Thread Peter Wemm
John Baldwin wrote: > > On 16-May-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > Oh, I'd like you to think twice about this. Massive amounts of driver > > rototilling should be avoided at this point. > > Well, it's causing panics in some cases. Those are bad. Basically I would b e > reverting earlier ch

RE: panic: sleeping process owns a mutex

2001-05-16 Thread John Baldwin
On 16-May-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Oh, I'd like you to think twice about this. Massive amounts of driver > rototilling should be avoided at this point. Well, it's causing panics in some cases. Those are bad. Basically I would be reverting earlier changes. > On Wed, 16 May 2001, John Baldw

RE: panic: sleeping process owns a mutex

2001-05-16 Thread Matthew Jacob
Oh, I'd like you to think twice about this. Massive amounts of driver rototilling should be avoided at this point. On Wed, 16 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 16-May-01 Bob Bishop wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This while building world, with a kernel cvsup at Fri Apr 27 04:06:40 BST > > 2001 >

RE: panic: sleeping process owns a mutex

2001-05-16 Thread John Baldwin
On 16-May-01 Bob Bishop wrote: > Hi, > > This while building world, with a kernel cvsup at Fri Apr 27 04:06:40 BST > 2001 > > kern/kern_synch.c:386 sleeping with "vr0" locked from pci/if_vr.c:1315 > > abridged backtrace: > > panic() > propagate_priority() > _mtx_lock_sleep() > vr_intr() > ith