on 06/09/2010 15:17 Andriy Gapon said the following:
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
depending
on the desired architecture:
on 06/09/2010 20:12 Olivier Smedts said the following:
Here is mine : no difference before and after the patch :
Thanks!
[snip]
The only thing I noticed is this, after the patch :
ada1 at ahcich1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
ada1: SAMSUNG HD161HJ JF100-19 ATA-7 SATA 2.x device
ada1:
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
on the desired architecture:
http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/intel-cpu-topo.diff
I see
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
depending
on the desired
on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
RELENG_8:
- Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10)
- Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel C2D E6600 (stepping 6)
I'll make sure to provide what the topology
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:56:01PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/09/2010 15:23 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:17:42PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it
on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
RELENG_8:
- Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
RELENG_8:
- Supermicro X7SBA + Intel C2D E8400 (stepping 10)
- Supermicro X7SBL-LN2 + Intel
2010/9/6 Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org:
on 06/09/2010 19:22 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 04:28:02PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/09/2010 16:12 Jeremy Chadwick said the following:
Great, thanks! I'll be testing this out on two separate systems, both
On 29 August 2010 13:25, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[Reposted from stable@; edited]
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c depending
on the desired architecture:
on 30/08/2010 12:15 pluknet said the following:
On 29 August 2010 13:25, Andriy Gapon a...@freebsd.org wrote:
[Reposted from stable@; edited]
The below patch is against sources in FreeBSD tree, it should be applied
either to sys/amd64/amd64/mp_machdep.c or sys/i386/i386/mp_machdep.c
on 29/08/2010 12:25 Andriy Gapon said the following:
The patch is substantially based on the Junk-uk's patch, but with some changes
I several times mistyped Jung-uk's name, my sincere apologies.
Probably should have used jkim instead :)
Thanks to rdivacky for pointing this out to me.
--
Andriy
13 matches
Mail list logo