Re: possible NETGRAPH/NG_ETHER bug

2000-07-19 Thread Archie Cobbs
Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO writes: > again, here is one of the millions of possible patches that works for me :) > > *** ng_ether.c.old Tue Jul 18 21:17:54 2000 > --- ng_ether.c Tue Jul 18 21:48:46 2000 > *** > *** 293,298 > --- 293,299 > bzero(priv, sizeof(*pr

RE: possible NETGRAPH/NG_ETHER bug

2000-07-19 Thread Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
[...] > From: Archie Cobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Julian Elischer writes: > > > i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH > > > and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not > > > detach correctly when interface is gone. i was taking a very quick

Re: possible NETGRAPH/NG_ETHER bug

2000-07-14 Thread Archie Cobbs
Julian Elischer writes: > > i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH > > and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not > > detach correctly when interface is gone. i was taking a very quick > > look at it, and, it seems to me that we are missing one ref

RE: possible NETGRAPH/NG_ETHER bug

2000-07-13 Thread Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
> I object to these patches. > the idea is good but these patches are misguided.. ok :) i did not say that is an ultimate solution :) i did not even say that they are good :) the only idea behind these patches is to show that there is a _possible_ node reference problem :) that's it :) [...]

Re: possible NETGRAPH/NG_ETHER bug

2000-07-13 Thread Julian Elischer
I object to these patches. the idea is good but these patches are misguided.. Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO wrote: > > Hello All, > > i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH > and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not > detach correctly when interf