Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/9/14, 2:43 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 8/8/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some
hours it is crashing with:
# poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date
[...]
mtree: illegal option -- N
usage: mtree [-LPUcdeinqruxw] [-f spec] [-f spec] [-K key] [-k key] [-p
path] [-s seed]
[-X excludes]
*** Error code 1
[...]
The host where poudriere is running is:
# uname -a
FreeBSD vm-tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18
12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
i386
i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update
the host where poudriere is running before?
Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0
release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end
of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way.
It could be that older releases building 10 and head for Poudriere may
be an issue still. I'll have to test more. Specifically the call of
'make distrib-dirs DB_FROM_SRC=1' seemingly not using the itools version
of mtree.
Also note that running a head jail on a 10.0 system is not really
supported. You may run into many weird issues building packages. It's
supported to have your host be newer than the jails but not the other
way around.
Regards,
Bryan Drewery
I had to do
cd /usr/src/{mumble}/mtree; make ; make install
before I could upgrade from where I was in the current branch to
where I wanted to get the 10 branch.
similar for install.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/9/2014 1:50 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:27:40PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures? Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it on the next run? Yes I agree this should probably change. I'll evaluate it after the 3.1 release which is the major focus right now. The jail command has a lot of issues with building and error handling. I have updated last night the host to 'head' and poudriere itself to poudriere-devel-3.0.99.20140801. Compiling the ports in the jail makes progress, as always with some hick-ups in the ports itself. I have one fundamental question, maybe a missunderstanding of poudriere: When I run 'poudriere options ...' it is not using the toolchain in the jail: # uname -a FreeBSD vm-tiny-r269739 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r269739: Sat Aug 9 07:07:40 CEST 2014 guru@vm-tiny-r269739:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ # poudriere version 3.1-pre # poudriere options -c -j freebsd-head -p ports-head x11/kde4 brings up the Options menu of x11/kde4 and when you look with ps, it uses /usr/local/bin/dialog4ports for this: # ps ax | fgrep dialog 92303 3 I+ 0:00,00 /usr/local/bin/dialog4ports when I terminate the dialog, it seems that the pkg-* tools are used (which ofc are not installed on the host): === Setting user-specified options for kde-4.12.5 and dependencies /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found make[1]: /usr/local/poudriere/ports/ports-head/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk line 99: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static which -qo /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so || : /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found What I'm doing wrong or have understand wrong? Thanks matthias It is known, please see https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/tktview?name=40060873f3 -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
El día Monday, August 11, 2014 a las 12:14:39PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: when I terminate the dialog, it seems that the pkg-* tools are used (which ofc are not installed on the host): === Setting user-specified options for kde-4.12.5 and dependencies /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found make[1]: /usr/local/poudriere/ports/ports-head/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk line 99: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static which -qo /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so || : /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found What I'm doing wrong or have understand wrong? Thanks matthias It is known, please see https://fossil.etoilebsd.net/poudriere/tktview?name=40060873f3 I'm not sure, after reading the ticket, if it is the same issue. My concern is: why 'poudriere options ...' is awaiting some tools in the hosts /usr/local/sbin/pkg-* to configure the options. If the existance of /usr/local/sbin/pkg-* is a prerequired port to make poudriere happy, it should pull the port in or at least mention this is the man page. My host still has the old pkg_* tools installed. Am I more clear now? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:27:40PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures? Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it on the next run? Yes I agree this should probably change. I'll evaluate it after the 3.1 release which is the major focus right now. The jail command has a lot of issues with building and error handling. I have updated last night the host to 'head' and poudriere itself to poudriere-devel-3.0.99.20140801. Compiling the ports in the jail makes progress, as always with some hick-ups in the ports itself. I have one fundamental question, maybe a missunderstanding of poudriere: When I run 'poudriere options ...' it is not using the toolchain in the jail: # uname -a FreeBSD vm-tiny-r269739 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r269739: Sat Aug 9 07:07:40 CEST 2014 guru@vm-tiny-r269739:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 $ # poudriere version 3.1-pre # poudriere options -c -j freebsd-head -p ports-head x11/kde4 brings up the Options menu of x11/kde4 and when you look with ps, it uses /usr/local/bin/dialog4ports for this: # ps ax | fgrep dialog 92303 3 I+ 0:00,00 /usr/local/bin/dialog4ports when I terminate the dialog, it seems that the pkg-* tools are used (which ofc are not installed on the host): === Setting user-specified options for kde-4.12.5 and dependencies /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found make[1]: /usr/local/poudriere/ports/ports-head/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk line 99: warning: Couldn't read shell's output for /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static which -qo /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so || : /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static: not found What I'm doing wrong or have understand wrong? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/8/2014 11:46 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: Hello, I'm setting up a jail with poudriere(8) to compile my ports; after some hours it is crashing with: # poudriere jail -c -j freebsd-head -m svn+http -v head ; date [...] mtree: illegal option -- N usage: mtree [-LPUcdeinqruxw] [-f spec] [-f spec] [-K key] [-k key] [-p path] [-s seed] [-X excludes] *** Error code 1 [...] The host where poudriere is running is: # uname -a FreeBSD vm-tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18 12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update the host where poudriere is running before? Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0 release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way. It could be that older releases building 10 and head for Poudriere may be an issue still. I'll have to test more. Specifically the call of 'make distrib-dirs DB_FROM_SRC=1' seemingly not using the itools version of mtree. Also note that running a head jail on a 10.0 system is not really supported. You may run into many weird issues building packages. It's supported to have your host be newer than the jails but not the other way around. Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 07:12:15PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribió: Hi! The host where poudriere is running is: # uname -a FreeBSD vm-tiny-r255948 10.0-ALPHA4 FreeBSD 10.0-ALPHA4 #1: Fri Oct 18 12:10:57 CEST 2013 g...@aurora.sisis.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update the host where poudriere is running before? Yes. Go for 10.0-REL p7, then retry. Can you explain, why? If one looks at the code which is executed in the jail, it looks like this (for better readability I have changed the colons ':' in the PATH by newlines): PATH=/usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/games /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/legacy/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/tmp/usr/games /tmp/install.l1aks4sC make LOCAL_MTREE= distrib-dirs mtree -N /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/etc -deU -f /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist -p /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-head/ mtree: illegal option -- N usage: mtree [-LPUcdeinqruxw] [-f spec] [-f spec] [-K key] [-k key] [-p path] [-s seed] [-X excludes] *** Error code 1 i.e. the tool 'mtree' is run from a hardcoded PATH from inside the jail which was just compiled. Why the 'mtree' from a Makefile in CURRENT is called with the -N flag, or why the 'mtree' from CURRENT does not understand the -N flag? I do not have a SVN checked out CURRENT to look into at the moment, but I think either the Makefile or mtree is broken in CURRENT. And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures? Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it on the next run? -- 6 years to go ! 6 years to go to where or what? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0 release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way. It could be that older releases building 10 and head for Poudriere may be an issue still. I'll have to test more. Specifically the call of 'make distrib-dirs DB_FROM_SRC=1' seemingly not using the itools version of mtree. This is perhaps the problem. Also note that running a head jail on a 10.0 system is not really supported. You may run into many weird issues building packages. It's supported to have your host be newer than the jails but not the other way around. Hmm? The poudriere has the '-m svn' flag for creating jails. If one uses this flag, the jail will always be newer than the host. If this is an issue (which I do not understand if things are done in a jail, using the toolchain of the jail) then this flag should be deleted from poudriere, IMHO. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
Hi! i.e. a CURRENT from Oct 2013 (r255948). Does this mean I should update the host where poudriere is running before? Yes. Go for 10.0-REL p7, then retry. Can you explain, why? bdrewery@ knows much more about it than I do 8-) I only know that it helps to use a recent system if one tries to debug issues 8-} And: It takes time for others to help if one tries to use some -ALPHA to do recent things... -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 6 years to go ! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/8/2014 2:11 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 01:43:51PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: Yes. For you it is fixed in stable/10 r257460 (which was in before 10.0 release) which added -N to mtree. There was a lot of polish at the end of 10.0 so you should probably upgrade to at least 10.0 either way. It could be that older releases building 10 and head for Poudriere may be an issue still. I'll have to test more. Specifically the call of 'make distrib-dirs DB_FROM_SRC=1' seemingly not using the itools version of mtree. This is perhaps the problem. Also note that running a head jail on a 10.0 system is not really supported. You may run into many weird issues building packages. It's supported to have your host be newer than the jails but not the other way around. Hmm? The poudriere has the '-m svn' flag for creating jails. If one uses this flag, the jail will always be newer than the host. If this is an issue (which I do not understand if things are done in a jail, using the toolchain of the jail) then this flag should be deleted from poudriere, IMHO. Thanks matthias The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release jumps are not supported. You can usually get away with a head host using a head jail that is a few weeks newer as long as KBI does not change. Doing major releases though can get into trouble with unknown syscalls and different sized structs and capabilities. FreeBSD only tries to be backwards-compatible with its interfaces (among major releases), not guaranteed to be forward or even backwards compatible with head from yesterday. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/8/2014 1:57 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: And, btw., why is poudriere removing all the jail when an error occures? Wouldn't it be better to let it there to have a look into and remove it on the next run? Yes I agree this should probably change. I'll evaluate it after the 3.1 release which is the major focus right now. The jail command has a lot of issues with building and error handling. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release jumps are not supported. You can usually get away with a head host using a head jail that is a few weeks newer as long as KBI does not change. ... OK, thanks. I will update the host to head and try again. Btw: I did not saw any loud yells of poudriere. Maybe, because I went away from the desk when poudriere was doing the SVN checkout and when I came back it was already nicely compiling. Maybe it should ask a question like: Do your really want that new jail on your old system? And wait for the answer :-) Thanks for your time. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X- No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: poudriere: setting up jail failes
On 8/8/2014 2:42 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Friday, August 08, 2014 a las 02:24:18PM -0500, Bryan Drewery escribió: The use of -v head from a 10.0 system is the issue. Once you start a build poudriere yells loudly that it is not supported. Major release jumps are not supported. You can usually get away with a head host using a head jail that is a few weeks newer as long as KBI does not change. ... OK, thanks. I will update the host to head and try again. Btw: I did not saw any loud yells of poudriere. Maybe, because I went away from the desk when poudriere was doing the SVN checkout and when I came back it was already nicely compiling. Maybe it should ask a question like: Do your really want that new jail on your old system? And wait for the answer :-) Thanks for your time. matthias Only in 'bulk', not 'jail'. There's also a securelevel blocker in 'bulk' that is not in 'jail'. Some of these need to move to 'jail' to warn earlier, yes. -- Regards, Bryan Drewery signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
