On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files on
individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf, sysctl.conf,
a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a trivial way to maintain local revision
On 7 October 2013 22:08, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files
on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf,
sysctl.conf, a
On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely
helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts
I've cooked up use ci(1) to keep a record of changes made during the
On 10/7/13 2:14 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:08 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
And sorry, what I left out was how having ci/co in the base is immensely
helpful with the installer scripts I write. The server installation scripts
I've cooked up use ci(1) to
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
a kernel and a few
Hello, Igor.
You wrote 8 октября 2013 г., 1:26:07:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
IM So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
IM decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
IM a kernel and a few bits that
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away
On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
svnlite? :)
Thanks Lev Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a
lot of stuff on this end...
Cheers,
--
Igor M.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
Install from ports is a non-starter. Our development systems will never be
connected to the internet for a ports upgrade. In this environment, in-base
RCS is a very useful tool.
Why is install from packages any harder than
.. don't be surprised how many people do exactly this; then compile what
handful of things they need from source in order to make a server.
-adrian
On 7 October 2013 14:53, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 7 Oct 2013, at 22:14, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Igor Mozolevsky i...@hybrid-lab.co.ukwrote:
On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org wrote:
svnlite? :)
Thanks Lev Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a
lot of stuff on this end...
Why does that screw up
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems,
without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs.
We are physically air-gapped from
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your
systems, without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the
On 2013-10-07, at 3:45 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
Having RCS in the base system is very useful. We use it to track changes to
bits of /etc on the machines where we don't do wholesale customizations.
(Those ones get git, but they also get an install of /usr/ports with a
Hi!
Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.
If everyone who communicates says x and no-one says anything about the
other letters a-w, y, z, then we as developers don't really have a
good cross-section of what people actually
On 2013-10-07, at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.
So when was this first discussed? I've been on -current for over a decade. If
I missed a prior discussion I
On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Then you and others should stand up and provide feedback like this far, far
earlier in the development process.
Adiran this is the first I've heard of removing RCS.
I would have screamed about it had I heard anything..
so now that I officially
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
-a
On 7 October 2013 16:46, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/8/13 7:37 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Then you and others should stand up and provide
On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed.
Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's users
will never use your preferred communication media. So when you propose to
remove a
On 7 October 2013 16:58, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 4:49 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed.
Adrian, something to keep in mind is that the majority of your code's
users will never use
On 10/8/13 6:45 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your systems,
without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the base release ISO images burned
On 8 October 2013 01:00, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
[snip]
Oh, I know it's an up-hill battle. But I honestly thought that this had
been communicated on a list somewhere. It seems.. not. I don't know why.
Gah.
It's been communicated at Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:43:21 -0400, but that
Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 17:29 -0400:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
So there's no version
On 10/8/13 5:29 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:26:07PM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson andrn...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
a kernel and a few bits that are barely sufficient for the initial set up,
On 2013-10-07, at 5:40 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
svnlite?
fail
I won't go that far, immediately.
But I need a tool that lets me migrate the history of my RCS files to the new
regime.
And the new tools(s) *must* be part of the base system. (Migration tools
included.)
Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 20:42 -0400:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just
distribute
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
-a
It was mentioned briefly on stable@
On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Julian Elischer wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your
systems, without any of your own code or any customisation?
We install from the base release ISO images burned on DVDs.
We are physically air-gapped from the internet, none
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
No, not really.
# mkdir local
# svnadmin create ./local
# svn import /etc file:///$PWD/local
besides the s/svn/svnlite/ you forgot... It doesn't work... Sure it
WITH_SVN in src.conf will install svnlite
On 8 October 2013 01:58, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
-a
It was mentioned briefly on stable@
On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
[snip]
Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that
a path might be a file: url relative to the current working directory...
I don't
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it
showed up in some of the messages there.
I don't see any discussion as to why the code
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 02:03:44AM +0100, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
[snip]
Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that
a path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/13 17:42, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:36:42PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When
did FreeBSD decide to move away from distributing a usable
OS? Why not just
On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
involved rcs, I just spot-checked a few and confirmed my memory that it
showed up in some of the messages there.
I
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/8/13 9:05 AM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 5:58 PM, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have not re-read those threads to see just how much of the discussion
involved rcs, I just spot-checked a
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see RCS remain in base as well. Many enterprise distro
still ship it by default too. There is no compelling reason to remove it.
I sort of retract that statement. I thought the base RCS was already
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/07/13 18:37, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Adam Vande More
amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
I would like to see RCS remain in base as well. Many enterprise
distro still ship it by default too. There is no
On 2013-10-07, at 6:05 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg lyn...@orthanc.ca wrote:
I don't see any discussion as to why the code (CVS, in this case) *needs* to
be removed.
My stupidity: I meant RCS, not CVS.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
Glen Barber wrote this message on Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 20:59 -0400:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
No, not really.
# mkdir local
# svnadmin create ./local
# svn import /etc file:///$PWD/local
besides the s/svn/svnlite/ you
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:45:23PM -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
On 2013-10-07, at 2:53 PM, David Chisnall thera...@freebsd.org wrote:
Or do you really only run the base OS and no other software on your
systems, without
42 matches
Mail list logo