Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have a disagreement regarding something.. Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or so.. please be patient for a day or so (we

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have a disagreement regarding something.. Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have a disagreement regarding something.. Unfortunatly

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that 4.x statically compiled threaded binaries will not work right because we've changed the kernel ABI in an incompatible

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that 4.x statically compiled threaded binaries will not work right because

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | threads is broken right now.. | due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have | a disagreement regarding something.. | Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or | so.. | please be patient for a day

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Edwin Culp
Quoting Wesley Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: | Boot from a kernel from a day or two ago and you should be fine. Unless | you build every day, your kernel.old/kernel should be in agreement with | libc_r I do build everyday and Thanks, ed To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Daniel Eischen wrote: Ok so I reconnected the libc_r and fixed it to compile. I'm a littel uncomfortable because the new kernel behaviour means that 4.x statically compiled

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: Unfortunately, we didn't get expansion of the i386 mcontext_t to make room for SSE, into 4.0, and the problem has been mostly ignored since then. Looks like it is a large problem. Any chance of avoiding this in the future by adding an extensible, but known to be suboptimal

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Bruce Evans wrote: Unfortunately, we didn't get expansion of the i386 mcontext_t to make room for SSE, into 4.0, and the problem has been mostly ignored since then. Looks like it is a large problem. Any chance of avoiding this in the future by

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Daniel Eischen wrote: That's kind of the point of adding the fields that we did (mc_len, mc_fpformat). They can be used to help validate the contents and to allow extensions. We also have some spare slots, but the last incarnation of ucontext_t also had spare slots and it wasn't nearly

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-19 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: Daniel Eischen wrote: That's kind of the point of adding the fields that we did (mc_len, mc_fpformat). They can be used to help validate the contents and to allow extensions. We also have some spare slots, but the last incarnation of

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 00:32, Edwin Culp wrote: I just realized that slapd dumps core with: Fatal error '_pq_insert_head: prioq not protected!' at line 185 in file /usr/src/lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_priority_queue.c (errno = 22) Abort (core dumped) I have recompiled openldap and db3 but

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have a disagreement regarding something.. Unfortunatly the person to slap up over this is offline for aday or so.. please be patient for a day or so (we hope). On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Edwin Culp wrote: I

Re: slapd dumping core with today's current.

2002-09-18 Thread Wesley Morgan
Boot from a kernel from a day or two ago and you should be fine. Unless you build every day, your kernel.old/kernel should be in agreement with libc_r On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: threads is broken right now.. due to a miscommunicatin,. the kernel and the threads library have