Re: smbfs second mount
I think it should *definitely* be in the base system. :) > On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > > > Out of curiosity, are there any plans to commit the smbfs stuff? It is > > really useful and I'd love to see it in the base system. > > Yes, I'm get much more responses about smbfs compared to nwfs. So, > probably it should be in the base system. > > -- > Boris Popov > http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs second mount
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Brandon D. Valentine wrote: > Out of curiosity, are there any plans to commit the smbfs stuff? It is > really useful and I'd love to see it in the base system. Yes, I'm get much more responses about smbfs compared to nwfs. So, probably it should be in the base system. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs second mount
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, kit wrote: > On Freebsd 4.0-Release > I am trying the smbfs-1.2.1 to mount a couple of NT shares so > that I can read some files and copy them to a web server. > > The problem I am having is that the second mount kills the first. Ok, this problem fixed along with others NT related things. An updated version (1.2.2) can downloaded from ftp://ftp.butya.kz/pub/smbfs/smbfs.tar.gz -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs second mount
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, Boris Popov wrote: > Thats strange, I have four smbfs mounts on my machine. Out of curiosity, are there any plans to commit the smbfs stuff? It is really useful and I'd love to see it in the base system. Brandon D. Valentine -- "You should believe in death, taxes, Larry Ellison's loathing of Bill Gates and Intel's inability to ship a working chipset." - Dr Spinola, The Register, 05/13/2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: smbfs second mount
On Sun, 18 Jun 2000, kit wrote: > The problem I am having is that the second mount kills the first. > > > then on ls BP I get > ls: BP: Broken pipe Thats strange, I have four smbfs mounts on my machine. > I thought that that might be because I had only 1 device entry in > /dev/net so I did No, device entry used only at the mount time and freed when mount_smbfs command terminated. > Which didn't help. What else should I check or try to get more > than one concurent smbfs mounted? Please send the output of 'smbutil -v lc' and 'df' commands to me. Exact version of NT server and SP number will be also useful. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
