Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
 Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
  Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
  Heimdal Kerberos.
 
 I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal.

Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the default telnetd in -CURRENT?
I didn't think that we did.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME  . FreeBSD UNIX .   Heimdal Kerberos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Mark Murray

 On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 06:38:57PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
  Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
   Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
   Heimdal Kerberos.
  
  I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal.
 
 Do we install the Heimdal telnetd as the default telnetd in -CURRENT?
 I didn't think that we did.

No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked
against Heimdal.

I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two.

M
-- 
o   Mark Murray
\_  FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine

On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
 No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked
 against Heimdal.
 
 I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two.

OK, great.  I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch?
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME  . FreeBSD UNIX .   Heimdal Kerberos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-30 Thread Mark Murray

 On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 01:47:24PM +, Mark Murray wrote:
  No. We dont. But if Kerberos5 is asked for, then BSD telnet is linked
  against Heimdal.
  
  I'm testing the fix, and will commit in a day or two.
 
 OK, great.  I assume you'll import it on the vendor branch?

Yup!

M
-- 
o   Mark Murray
\_  FreeBSD Services Limited
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-29 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine

On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:09:33AM -0500, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
 
 I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch
 which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed
 twice in the Heimdal code.
 
 Unfortunately, PR got no attention whatsoever for over a month now.
 It is currently assigned to Mark Murray.

Assar fixed this in Heimdal on 2001-06-24 (before Heimdal 0.4a).

We badly need to update Heimdal in the base system.  If assar or markm
don't get to it soon (I assume they are swamped), I'll visit the issue
in February.

Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
Heimdal Kerberos.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques A. Vidrine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.nectar.cc/
NTT/Verio SME  . FreeBSD UNIX .   Heimdal Kerberos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  .  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-29 Thread Terry Lambert

Jacques A. Vidrine wrote:
 Meanwhile, do yourself a favor and use the Heimdal port if you want
 Heimdal Kerberos.

I think he cares more about telnet than Heimdal.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread M. Warner Losh

In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
:  You should:
:  ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT)
: 
:   Hmmm, what does that do exactly?  I don't have a file name aj
: (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file
: either which I assume is a symlink to aj.

You don't need to have the target of the symlink.  malloc does a
readlink to get its options to save disk accesses...

Warner

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Kris Kennaway

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:43:43PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote:

  You should:
  ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT)
 
   Hmmm, what does that do exactly?  I don't have a file name aj
 (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file
 either which I assume is a symlink to aj.

man malloc

Anyway, this is probably a bug in telnetd.

Kris



msg33898/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Alexander N. Kabaev


I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch
which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed
twice in the Heimdal code.

Unfortunately, PR got no attention whatsoever for over a month now.
It is currently assigned to Mark Murray.

--
Alexander Kabaev


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy

On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:

 In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 :  You should:
 :  ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT)
 :
 : Hmmm, what does that do exactly?  I don't have a file name aj
 : (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file
 : either which I assume is a symlink to aj.

 You don't need to have the target of the symlink.  malloc does a
 readlink to get its options to save disk accesses...

I see how it works now since I thought aj was the name of a file
and not a symlink.


Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President    __ 
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
WurldLink Corporation  / / / /  | /  | __] ]
San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong  / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[]
Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message



Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy

On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:

 I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch
 which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed
 twice in the Heimdal code.

 Unfortunately, PR got no attention whatsoever for over a month now.
 It is currently assigned to Mark Murray.

The patch worked.  Something tells me assar will get to this one
first. :-)


Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President    __ 
Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / |  / |[__  ]
WurldLink Corporation  / / / /  | /  | __] ]
San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong  / / / / / |/ / | __] ]
HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[]
Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message