On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
log spam.
If it's the same
On 14 Jun 2010, at 03:11, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
On Sun, 13.06.2010 at 12:03:05 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
Current version in STABLE as well as CURRENT
(v0.6.8) is suffering from CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
log spam.
If it's the same problem, looks like it's fixed in v0.6.10
Rui Paulo-3 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
I'll likely work on this soon.
--
Rui Paulo
That's splendid, thanks for fast reply.
Is MFC to 8 feasible?
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 12:40, Jakub Lach wrote:
Rui Paulo-3 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
I'll likely work on this soon.
--
Rui Paulo
That's splendid, thanks for fast reply.
Is MFC to 8 feasible?
Rui Paulo-3 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 12:40, Jakub Lach wrote:
Rui Paulo-3 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2010, at 04:23, Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
Is update of wpa_supplicant planned?
I'll likely work on this soon.
--
Rui Paulo
That's splendid, thanks for fast reply.
Is MFC
