Re: Restricting ftpd commands (fwd)

2000-09-01 Thread Wes Peters
thomas r stromberg wrote: > >BTW, anyone ever notice that ftp.openbsd.org is (more then likely it >just claims to be) SunOS 4.1? No, it's a SPARC server they're given free use of. It is barely SunOS any more, most of the userland has been "upgraded" to more current stuff. Replies direc

Re: Restricting ftpd commands (fwd)

2000-08-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > The following got no response on -security two weeks ago. Perhaps > -current will have more opinions. > > -- Forwarded message -- > > I have found quite a few commands that ftpd shouldn't necessarily be > responding to if the use

Re: Restricting ftpd commands (fwd)

2000-08-29 Thread thomas r stromberg
On 29-Aug-2000, Chris D. Faulhaber popped this into my mailspool: > The following got no response on -security two weeks ago. Perhaps > -current will have more opinions. > > -- Forwarded message -- > > I have found quite a few commands that ftpd shouldn't necessarily be > respon

Restricting ftpd commands (fwd)

2000-08-29 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
The following got no response on -security two weeks ago. Perhaps -current will have more opinions. -- Forwarded message -- I have found quite a few commands that ftpd shouldn't necessarily be responding to if the user hasn't logged in. In total, the following commands are taug