Re: SMP + APM = panic - fixed!

2000-06-07 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, then panic... The followings is a patch to fix

SMP + APM = panic - fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Hi, We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, then panic... The followings is a patch to fix the problem. Thanks a lot, SUMITANI-san! Please test

Re: SMP + APM = panic - fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 02:06:15AM +0900, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, then panic... The followings is a

Re: SMP + APM = panic - fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Please test this and I'll commit MFC this if we have no problem with this fix. I don't have an SMP + APM system around at the moment, but the fix does look correct to me, go ahead and commit it. Thanks for tracking this down! Thank you for reviewing this. I'm going to comit tomorrow

Re: SMP + APM = panic - fixed!

2000-06-06 Thread Boris Popov
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote: We're having this problem for long time (from the old 4.0-CURRENT days), but Mr. SUMITANI discovered a bug and fixed it. The problem was that we got worng gdt pointer for the current cpu, then panic... The followings is a patch to fix the problem.