buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or alternatively rename the structure to pc98_partition or similar. I would advocate the latter. Poul-Henning === usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Takahashi Yoshihiro
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or alternatively rename the structure to pc98_partition or similar. I think that the name

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread phk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be more some similar code in places like truss or the debugger) or alternatively rename the

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Takahashi Yoshihiro writes: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I think you need to either #ifdef something here (and there may be more some similar code in places like truss

Re: buildworld trouble: multiple struct dos_partition.

2003-01-03 Thread Terry Lambert
Bruce Evans wrote: pc98_partition is OK, but mbr_partition is bogus since partition tables are not restricted to the MBR -- there is one in every extended partition. sys/diskpc98.h is similarly OK and sys/diskmbr.h is similarly bogus. at386 would be a better prefix/suffix than mbr for the