Re: can we build only static libs from the makefiles in /usr/src ?

2001-09-02 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > i am trying to do some cross-development for picobsd, and i really > > need only the static libraries. > > Is there anyways to avoid building the shared libs using the > > standard makefiles (in /usr/src and /usr/share/mk/*) ? > > NOPIC. I don't kn

Re: can we build only static libs from the makefiles in /usr/src ?

2001-09-01 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > i am trying to do some cross-development for picobsd, and i really > need only the static libraries. > Is there anyways to avoid building the shared libs using the > standard makefiles (in /usr/src and /usr/share/mk/*) ? NOPIC. I don't know if it works g

can we build only static libs from the makefiles in /usr/src ?

2001-09-01 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Hi, i am trying to do some cross-development for picobsd, and i really need only the static libraries. Is there anyways to avoid building the shared libs using the standard makefiles (in /usr/src and /usr/share/mk/*) ? I see there is a NOPROFILE variable that presumably disables building the prof