On 11/17/14, 6:55 AM, Chris H wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:55:16 -0800 Rui Paulo wrote
On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
suggest new tasks. Again i am
On Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:55:16 -0800 Rui Paulo wrote
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> > for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> > suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the projects
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
>>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
>>> for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever w
On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the projects
> suggested there are not important, just belong somewhere e
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Mark Saad wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 14, 2014, at 4:27 AM, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> >>> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >>> But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequ
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:55:16PM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Nov 13, 2014, at 17:40, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > But please nuke the current list -- it is completely inadequate
> > for the code-in candidates and misleading for whoever wants to
> > suggest new tasks. Again i am not saying that the pr
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 01:56:27PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 9, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Wojciech A. Koszek
> wrote:
> > > Hello,
>
> BTW, FYI:
>
> We didn't make it this year.
>
> Judging by the GSoC 2014 Reunion, there is a l
