In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], David W. Chapman Jr.
writes:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a real one; it's
also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
disks up).
I have the shar of the
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a real one; it's
also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
disks up).
If we're going to keep it, it should be turned off by default at any rate.
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a real one; it's
also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
disks up).
I have the shar of the port up at
http://people.freebsd.org:~/dwcjr/diskcheckd.shar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 2:49 AM
Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
From: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
Date: Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought
From: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: diskcheckd is poo
Date: Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 04:14:24PM -0700
If we want a surface scrubber, we ought to have a real one; it's
also very, very bad in the laptop context (since it keeps waking your
disks up).
If we're going to keep
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 10:07:15PM +0200, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Søren Schmidt wrote:
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
I would like to
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:11:00PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
If someone could roll a tarball for me, I could atleast make the
skeleton for the port if not finish it off.
We should just repo copy it to ports. See how I do the setcdboot port.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
I would like to remove it from the base system and put it in ports. I
really don't see what
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
diskcheckd is very annoying. Many doubt its usefulness in detecting
errors before it is too late. It thinks 40% of my disks are bad (which
I don't). I've turned it off, I know many that have.
I would like to remove it from the base system and put it in
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 01:57:15PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 03:11:00PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
If someone could roll a tarball for me, I could atleast make the
skeleton for the port if not finish it off.
We should just repo copy it to ports. See how
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 05:51:41PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote:
Here is a shar of what I am working on. Comments patches and
complaints are appreciated. I just have to make the rc script for it
to startup on boot.
http://people.freebsd.org/~dwcjr/diskcheckd.shar
--
Update: I
12 matches
Mail list logo
