On 2014-06-27 05:50, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:27:56AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:14+0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I have frequently found myself using sysctls to control some kernel
>>> feature where a string would be a better (and somet
On Friday, June 27, 2014 5:14:59 am Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I have frequently found myself using sysctls to control some kernel
> feature where a string would be a better (and sometimes the only)
> option than using a numeric value, yet the internal representation
> should be numeric for speed a
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:27:56AM +0200, Trond Endrest?l wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:14+0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I have frequently found myself using sysctls to control some kernel
> > feature where a string would be a better (and sometimes the only)
> > option than using a nume
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:14+0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I have frequently found myself using sysctls to control some kernel
> feature where a string would be a better (and sometimes the only)
> option than using a numeric value, yet the internal representation
> should be numeric for speed and
Hi,
I have frequently found myself using sysctls to control some kernel
feature where a string would be a better (and sometimes the only)
option than using a numeric value, yet the internal representation
should be numeric for speed and robustness.
Examples are the kern.timecounter, the default sch
