On 10/28/2011 12:37 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote:
are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and
already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect to
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
Few days ago I've started from fixing some issues in gmultipath and
already rewritten half of it while trying to make it usable. I expect to
have something to present in a week or two. It
Hi.
On 26.10.2011 12:09, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
>
> Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as
> I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a certain path due to failure, it
> will never come back automaticall
On 10/26/2011 2:09 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
Cheers,
are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
I was given patches but have lacked motivation to do it.
Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as
I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a certai
Cheers,
are there any plans to have gmultipath support for active/active?
Also, is there any way to check available paths periodically? As far as
I unterstand, once gmultipath kicks a certain path due to failure, it
will never come back automatically. (And it won't ever be used if it
isn't workin