Re: iflib.tx_abdicate: very strange behavior on incoming IPsec traffic (regression?)

2018-12-07 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 07.12.2018 18:02, Lev Serebryakov wrote: >> (I'm not sure, that it is exactly "bug" or "defect" and want to > ... discuss it here before filing PR. > >> Now I'm throwing IPsec into mix. All incoming traffic is tunneled with >> IPsec policy, with aes-128-gcm encryption. And with IPsec tx_abd

Re: iflib.tx_abdicate: very strange behavior on incoming IPsec traffic (regression?)

2018-12-07 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 07.12.2018 16:40, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > (I'm not sure, that it is exactly "bug" or "defect" and want to ... discuss it here before filing PR. > Now I'm throwing IPsec into mix. All incoming traffic is tunneled with > IPsec policy, with aes-128-gcm encryption. And with IPsec tx_abdicate >

iflib.tx_abdicate: very strange behavior on incoming IPsec traffic (regression?)

2018-12-07 Thread Lev Serebryakov
(I'm not sure, that it is exactly "bug" or "defect" and want to I've found very strange behavior of 13-CURRENT system I210 (igb) interfaces and enabled "dev.igb.X.iflib.tx_abdicate". I'm measuring "router" performance with BSDRP's "equilibrium" script (thank you, Oliver, for this great tool!)