Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
Thanks!
-adrian
adrian@lucy-11i386:~/work/freebsd/head-embedded/src/lib % svn
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
Of course,
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to eliminate, or is there something else that's
broken/missing?
The calls to
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
I've set up a Jenkins build of trunk using gcc 4.9:
https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_amd64_gcc4.9/
That build also keeps track of
On 20 May 2015 at 17:30, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
I've set up a Jenkins build of trunk using gcc 4.9:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
How much of FreeBSD have you been able to compile with gcc 4.9, and on
which
platform?
I get down to a little bit inside libc before I hit unused code warnings.
What platform are you compiling on? Are you looking
On 20 May 2015 at 00:50, Konstantin Belousov kostik...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 12:11:08AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
here's a patch against -head that eliminates gcc-4.9 complaining about
set-but-unused variables. It just comments them out for now - are
these okay to
