Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: >> Can you possibly try to narrow the differences down by tring out various >> kernel >> configs in between GPLUS and GENERIC? > > Actually- look at the diffs at least and tell me which you think it might > be. All of the diffs are either kernel support flavors

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread Matthew Jacob
> Can you possibly try to narrow the differences down by tring out various kernel > configs in between GPLUS and GENERIC? Actually- look at the diffs at least and tell me which you think it might be. All of the diffs are either kernel support flavors for alpha, which shouldn't matter to devfs for

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Mar-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: > > To refresh memory: > >> fatal kernel trap: >> >> trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) >> a0 = 0xc3615fe1a88f382 >> a1 = 0x29 >> a2 = 0x1b >> pc = 0xfc467578 >> ra = 0xfc46

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread Matthew Jacob
> > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > *I* sure can't spot what config option might be different. I also had done a > > complete removal of the build directory and complete fresh build of GPLUS. > > (sounds of hair tearing). > > > > Can anyone suggest what below might have caused this breakage?

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Matthew Jacob writes: > *I* sure can't spot what config option might be different. I also had done a > complete removal of the build directory and complete fresh build of GPLUS. > (sounds of hair tearing). > > Can anyone suggest what below might have caused this breakage? One WAG is that

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread Matthew Jacob
To refresh memory: > fatal kernel trap: > > trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) > a0 = 0xc3615fe1a88f382 > a1 = 0x29 > a2 = 0x1b > pc = 0xfc467578 > ra = 0xfc4627c4 > curproc= 0xfe0009f5dbe0 >

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-13 Thread Christian Weisgerber
Andrea Campi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seriously, if it's a new breakage, it's not breaking for everybody. As I already reported to -alpha, it's breaking for me (sources as of ~March 10) with a custom kernel. Doesn't happen with GENERIC. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Andrea Campi wrote: > Just today I started using DEVFS again after a long time, and it works > perfectly. From the scarce info you provide, our only apparent difference > is I don't have SCSI. > > If it weren't you, I'd ask if you are sure you have the very latest > sources,

Re: new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-12 Thread Andrea Campi
Just today I started using DEVFS again after a long time, and it works perfectly. From the scarce info you provide, our only apparent difference is I don't have SCSI. If it weren't you, I'd ask if you are sure you have the very latest sources, but of course I wonder you have more than enough clue

new breakage in mounting root? a devfs issue?

2001-03-12 Thread Matthew Jacob
complete fresh build, etc da0: invalid primary partition table: no magic start_init: trying /sbin/init fatal kernel trap: trap entry = 0x4 (unaligned access fault) a0 = 0xc3615fe1a88f382 a1 = 0x29 a2 = 0x1b pc = 0xfc467578 ra