Re: new problem?

2017-04-19 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, April 09, 2017 06:08:04 PM Jeffrey Bouquet wrote:
> i386_set_ldt: start=-1 num=1 descs=0x38449fac

This message is a harmless debug printf.  Somehow you compiled
sys/i386/i386/sys_machdep.c with 'DEBUG' defined to enable it
though.  (The message is not enabled by default.)
 
> Tons of those, eight at a time, newly spamming /var/log/messages, maybe after 
> a
> fsck_ffs -y the partitions after a crash, that fixed it,
> 
> as in
> df 
> df output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only
> ls
> ls output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only
> ..
> 2nd problem
> persistent LOR in  [several]
> 
> nvidia_os:c:662, 824
>  
> [dmesg only, above, ]
> 
> vfs_mount.c:1277
> ffs_softdep.c:1908
> vfs_subr.c:2600,  2150, 
> ffs_vnops.c:280
> vfs_bio.c:3500
> ufs_dirhash.c:281
> vfs_syscalls.c:3364
> 
> [some above also in dmesg, most in /var/log/messages...

There are several known LORs in the VFS/UFS code that are either false
positives or ones that have effectively been harmless.

-- 
John Baldwin
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


new problem?

2017-04-09 Thread Jeffrey Bouquet
i386_set_ldt: start=-1 num=1 descs=0x38449fac

Tons of those, eight at a time, newly spamming /var/log/messages, maybe after a
fsck_ffs -y the partitions after a crash, that fixed it,

as in
df 
df output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only
ls
ls output, then eight of the above line with the hex values varying only
..
2nd problem
persistent LOR in  [several]

nvidia_os:c:662, 824
 
[dmesg only, above, ]

vfs_mount.c:1277
ffs_softdep.c:1908
vfs_subr.c:2600,  2150, 
ffs_vnops.c:280
vfs_bio.c:3500
ufs_dirhash.c:281
vfs_syscalls.c:3364

[some above also in dmesg, most in /var/log/messages...

and another one or two I've wrote down but lost,
gfvs_* I think.
but that line above may be the cause of the i386 line at the top.   ? New 
one to me. 
Sorry. ! 
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"


new problem with X (was problem with X)

2003-01-30 Thread Kirk R. Wythers
Well... I added the line -fno-merge-constants to CFLAGS in
XFree86-4-Server's Makefile. The error 'Symbol from module
/usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a is unresolved' seems fixed.
However, now I'm getting the error:


XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/)
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE i386 [ELF]
Module Loader present
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
 (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
 (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown.
(==) Log file: /var/log/XFree86.0.log, Time: Thu Jan 30 12:44:38 2003
(==) Using config file: /etc/X11/XF86Config
Could not init font path element /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/,
removing from
 list!
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5: Undefined symbol
__thr_jtable

waiting for X server to shut down

For now I'm re-building each and every XFree86 bit individually (a very
time consuming process by the way). If anyone has a suggustion as to what
I should try at this point I'd appriate it...

Regards,

Kirk

Kirk R. Wythers email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Minnesota tel: 612.625.2261
Department of Forest Resources  fax: 612.625.5212
Saint Paul, MN 55108


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message