Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:20:05 -0400, Mixtim wrote: Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he is. Almost as bad as Linus. :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp You can checkout

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-05 Thread Mark Murray
According to Mark Murray: Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly recent option. AUTOKEY should be

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:18:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: So let me guess. Not only does Mills think that the web is the only sensible distribution medium for documentation, he also thinks that English is the only sensible language for it? Ha, you

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Mixtim
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he is. Almost as bad as Linus. :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp You can checkout

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mixtim wrote: On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he is. Almost as bad as Linus.

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Gordon Tetlow: From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work. That's correct. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very soon. The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now,

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:07:38 +0100, Mark Murray wrote: Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very soon. :-) :-) :-) Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Ollivier Robert wrote: Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very soon. The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, it can be linked to openssl but it

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Maxim Sobolev: libmd I meant. That's a possibility but it already has its own md5/des code. It is just that authentication through openssl is available and many 5.x / 4.x have it by default... It is required by sshd and friends but crypto is still optional. -- Ollivier ROBERT

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Garrett Wollman: I'd like to have the AUTOKEY functionality available if at all possible. Goodnews: the first run I've done of configure with --with-crypto=autokey give me no dependencies on openssl (which is necessary for public key stuff). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: Ollivier Robert wrote: Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very soon. The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, it

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Mark Murray
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very soon. :-) :-) :-) The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, it can be linked to openssl but it is still

Re: ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:52:19 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be doing HTML - mdoc transcription. Don't hold your breath then, he repeated two days ago he

ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 12:25:13 +0200, Ollivier Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component.