Re: ntpd 4.1
> According to Mark Murray: > > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? > > I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 > based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly > recent option. > > AUTOKEY should be enough. Any objection? No objection from me :-) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Sat, 04 Aug 2001 17:20:05 -0400, Mixtim wrote: > > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > > is. Almost as bad as Linus. > > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp > > You can checkout modules 'ntp' or 'ntpfaq'. > > Been there for a rather long time. That's totally irrelevant. David Mills doesn't make use of CVS. Someone else checks his changes in. Particularly in the documentation, these checkins consist of megacommits that mix sweeping content changes with massive tidy(1) style changes. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. > > I'm a bit reluctant to force openssl for just ntpd. > > Any ideas / comments ? What we do for a number of other system components that can be built with/without openssl/crypto support is to select that based on NO_OPENSSL (and some other -- semi-redundant -- checks), and make sure it's built twice in make release. Look at release/Makefile and the ppp and tcpdump code to see how it's done. Kris PGP signature
Re: ntpd 4.1
According to Mark Murray: > Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? I could of course but I don't think that having PUBKEYS by defaults (X.509 based, not the PGP ones) is probably not very useful yet as it is a fairly recent option. AUTOKEY should be enough. Any objection? -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
According to Gordon Tetlow: > >From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has > never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work. That's correct. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mixtim wrote: > On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > > is. Almost as bad as Linus. > > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp > > You can checkout modules 'ntp' or 'ntpfaq'. > > Been there for a rather long time. Actually, I was talking with the guy that manages the cvs repo for it. >From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his > ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he > is. Almost as bad as Linus. :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp You can checkout modules 'ntp' or 'ntpfaq'. Been there for a rather long time. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:18:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > So let me guess. Not only does Mills think that the web is the only > sensible distribution medium for documentation, he also thinks that > English is the only sensible language for it? Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he is. Almost as bad as Linus. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
ntpd 4.1
< said: > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. I'd like to have the AUTOKEY functionality available if at all possible. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 08:52:19 +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote: > > Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a > > sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be doing > > HTML -> mdoc transcription. > > Don't hold your breath then, he repeated two days ago he didn't want to > change the way he manages the documentation. I hold my breath for very little, these days. :-) What blows my mind is that he's not even willing to use slightly more translatable markup. He's just totally anti anything other than his own paradigm, which is that local documentation is dead and the web is the only place to put it. *mutter* Ciao, Sheldon. Sheldon Hearn Prime Apostle of the Church of Disillusioned Saints To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
According to Garrett Wollman: > I'd like to have the AUTOKEY functionality available if at all > possible. Goodnews: the first run I've done of configure with --with-crypto=autokey give me no dependencies on openssl (which is necessary for public key stuff). -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr 5.0-CURRENT #46: Wed Jan 3 15:52:00 CET 2001 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Ollivier Robert wrote: > > > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > > soon. > > > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. > > > > I'm a bit reluctant to force openssl for just ntpd. > > > > Any ideas / comments ? > > Why not to use libmd5? libmd I meant. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
> Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. :-) :-) :-) > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. > > I'm a bit reluctant to force openssl for just ntpd. Can you make it so that if NO_OPENSSL is not defined, then openssl is used? M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
According to Maxim Sobolev: > libmd I meant. That's a possibility but it already has its own md5/des code. It is just that authentication through openssl is available and many 5.x / 4.x have it by default... It is required by sshd and friends but crypto is still optional. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- Eurocontrol EEC/ITM -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD caerdonn.eurocontrol.fr 5.0-CURRENT #46: Wed Jan 3 15:52:00 CET 2001 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
Ollivier Robert wrote: > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > soon. > > The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code > builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, > it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component. > > I'm a bit reluctant to force openssl for just ntpd. > > Any ideas / comments ? Why not to use libmd5? -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: ntpd 4.1
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:07:38 +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very > > soon. > > :-) :-) :-) Unless David Mills can be convinced to manage his documentation in a sensible fashion, this will be the last upgrade for which I'll be doing HTML -> mdoc transcription. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
