The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches
correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c
--
Steve
http://troutmask.apl.washington.edu/~kargl/
--- usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c.origThu Jun 6 22:45:29 2002
+++ usr.bin/xinstall/xinstall.c Fri Jun 7 17:55:44 2002
@@
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches
correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c
The last patch is wrong, the others are good, though a warning about the
overriding of flags might be nice until this is ACCEPTED
J. Mallett said:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches
correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c
I should have stated that if the first patch isn't
acceptable, then the remaining patches should be
applied.
The
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The first patch fixes install(1). The reamining patches
correctly document the breakage of rev 1.55 of xinstall.c
I should have stated that if the first patch isn't
acceptable, then
J. Mallett said:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
No. The third patch is correct (see below); otherwise I could set
INSTALL to install -C QED.
And I could set BINOWN to something bogus.
Don't protect the user by removing functionality.
Well, if the
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
No. The third patch is correct (see below); otherwise I could set
INSTALL to install -C QED.
And I could set BINOWN to something bogus.
Don't protect
On Fri, Jun 07, 2002 at 10:08:25PM -0700, J. Mallett wrote:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
* From Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
J. Mallett said:
No. The third patch is correct (see below); otherwise I could set
INSTALL to install -C QED.