In message
, Conrad Meyer writes:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
> > The change to make the FreeBSD NFSv4 server use vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport is tr
> ivial
> > and I think being compatible with Linux is important (I see it as the defac
> to
> > standard NFS implementation
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:07 PM Rick Macklem wrote:
> The change to make the FreeBSD NFSv4 server use vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport is
> trivial
> and I think being compatible with Linux is important (I see it as the defacto
> standard NFS implementation these days).
>
> What do others think I should
It was my understanding that the NFSv4 working group believed that the
requirement
for the NFSv4 client to use a priviledged port# (< 1024) should not exist.
As such, I coded the server to ignore the vfs.nfsd.nfs_privport sysctl and
allow the
mount for NFSv4.
PR#234106 has reported this as a
