On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
>
> > Should I file a PR to track this or is that overkill?
>
> Yes, it would be overkill. Remind me if it's not fixed in a week or two.
I tested and committed the fix.
Please report any other profiling bugs for SMP.
On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
> Should I file a PR to track this or is that overkill?
Yes, it would be overkill. Remind me if it's not fixed in a week or two.
Bruce
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Should I file a PR to track this or is that overkill?
-Kip
--- Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
>
> > Thanks for working on this. I was going to try
> running
> > a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see
> what
> > the difference
On Sat, 19 Jan 2002, k Macy wrote:
> Thanks for working on this. I was going to try running
> a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see what
> the difference was in time distribution. On -STABLE
> it built without a hitch. However, on -CURRENT I got
> the following even after doing a make
Thanks for working on this. I was going to try running
a profiled kernel on -CURRENT and -STABLE to see what
the difference was in time distribution. On -STABLE
it built without a hitch. However, on -CURRENT I got
the following even after doing a make clean:
../../../libkern/mcount.c: In functio
