On 03:37+0700, Aug 12, 2002, Semen A. Ustimenko wrote:
Hi!
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
On 03:37+0700, Aug 12, 2002, Semen A. Ustimenko wrote:
David reviewed the patch and I have committed it few minutes ago.
Looks like a hack BDE is speaking about: passing a storage for residue
but never check it.
See another reply about this.
Hello,
On 14:43+0100, Aug 10, 2002, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
Hi,
For a few months now I have been seeing the following problems with the
ftpd in current. When transferring a large file, ftpd seems to
consistantly fail after almost all of the file hass been transferred. The
example
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
vfs clue. I CC'ed Robert Watson as an author of
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
vfs clue. I CC'ed Robert Watson as an author of
Hi!
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c. Here is my patch but I really need somebody with
