Re: should MINIMAL boot?
The definition of a MINIMAL used is a specific one- it does not contain anything which can be loaded by modules. It could be a starting point to something else, but then, it still contains other things you probably not need. If I get the point, I would probably try to boot MINIMAL on a new hardware, build all modules by default, see which modules get loaded and work from there. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-current-f3875308.html ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: should MINIMAL boot?
"Michael W. Lucas" writes: Hi, > Should a MINIMAL kernel boot and run? Seems this is not the case. You have to load storage related modules (disk controller, cam, geom classes required to taste disks), for example, to boot MINIMAL in a VMWare VM with scsi attached, GPT partionned disk : - cam.ko - mpt.ko - geom_part_gpt.ko Regards Éric Masson ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
should MINIMAL boot?
Hi, Tried booting MINIMAL on last weekend's current, on both UFS and ZFS hosts in VirtualBox. Neither could find its boot drive. Before I dive deeper and file a bug, wanted to ask: Should a MINIMAL kernel boot and run? If not, I won't waste my time. Thanks, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucashttps://mwl.io/ nonfiction: https://www.michaelwlucas.com/ fiction: https://www.michaelwarrenlucas.com/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
