Re: si_drv1 used already?

2001-03-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes: >> > >> >The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to >> >have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero). >> >It wo

Re: si_drv1 used already?

2001-03-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes: > > > >The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to > >have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero). > >It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during op

Re: si_drv1 used already?

2001-03-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Julian Elischer writes: > >The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to >have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero). >It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during open. >Changing the driver to use si_drv

si_drv1 used already?

2001-03-25 Thread Julian Elischer
The vmware vmmon driver used to use si_drv1 but suddenly it appears to have already been used (at least it is no-longer non-zero). It would fail to open because it checks it before using it during open. Changing the driver to use si_drv2 fixes the problem. Since drv1 is defined as 'for the use