Re: smbfs in -current?

2002-03-08 Thread Robert Watson
Ok, I've committed a slight reorg to NOTES on -CURRENT to reflect the much more logical layout in LINT on -STABLE WRT NETSMB, SMBFS, and NETSMBCRYPTO. No idea where the weird ordering came from, but I think it's fixed now. :-) Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD

Re: smbfs in -current?

2002-03-08 Thread Boris Popov
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Robert Watson wrote: Ok, I've committed a slight reorg to NOTES on -CURRENT to reflect the much more logical layout in LINT on -STABLE WRT NETSMB, SMBFS, and NETSMBCRYPTO. No idea where the weird ordering came from, but I think it's fixed now. :-) Thank you.

Re: smbfs in -current?

2002-03-07 Thread Boris Popov
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Seth Hettich wrote: I have both: options SMBFS options NETSMB in my config. Perhaps someone could give a little explanation, and add it to NOTES? Thanks for pointing to it. For some reason LINT from -stable have this explanation and NOTES

smbfs in -current?

2002-03-06 Thread Seth Hettich
The NOTES has no real info, and I don't see a man page... how is this supposed to work? I'm getting lots of: smbfs_smb.o: In function `smbfs_smb_lockandx': /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/SJH/../../../fs/smbfs/smbfs_smb.c(.text+0x90): undefin ed reference to `mb_put_uint8' I have both: options