Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation. mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation. ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. - Arnaud ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. So, a pointless email. 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation. ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly specified, right in the middle of the home page. Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I think you're just looking to nitpick. Chris ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly specified, right in the middle of the home page. Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I think you're just looking to nitpick. And, which is worse: 1. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP server, wait for the mirrors (FTP, CVS, SVN) to sync, then make the official announcement which includes a few days/weeks where the release is available but not official; or 2. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP server, make the official announcement, user goes to their favourite/closest mirror, and can't access the release since it hasn't synced yet I think people would complain a hell of a lot more about 2 than they currently do about 1. Yes, people upgrading via source will see X.Y-RELEASE before it's officially announced on the website/mailing lists. Yes, people browsing ftp.freebsd.org will see X.Y-RELEASE ISOs before it's officially announced. Yes, some users will get confused by seeing X.Y-RELEASE available before the official annoucements. But, that's a lot better than making an annoucement and having users unable to use it since it's not available on their local mirrors. What's annoying, though, is that we have to go through this with every ... single ... minor ... release. It's not a hard concept, yet every time there's a new release, people get confused by it. Is there something that could be done to make it more streamlined/smoother? Maybe, maybe not. Depends. You'd have to want to join the RE team to find out more about the current release/mirror infrastructure. :) And then be willing to put in the time/effort to improve it. :D Does all of Arnaud's complaining and nit-picking constitute a request to volunteer to fix things? ;) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence I am being sarcastic because I am frustrated. I am frustrated because I am having to repeat myself. pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. I pointed out no such thing. I am not misleading anyone, nor is the Project. You are. It is not officially distributing. It won't be officially distributed until, and only until, the signed email goes out. This is the third email in a row where I have made this flat, factual, statement. Until that time, the contents of various websites is irrelevant. That mail will not go out until (among other things): - the Release Engineering team determines there are no last-minute gotchas, - all the bits are on all the mirrors, so that users will not go to their local mirror, find it not there yet, then pound on the master, bringing it to a crawl, - the Release Notes are in their final form, - a news announcement is in its final form, and other things that I, not being on re@, am probably not aware of. These things are the *preparation* steps. They all have to be in place to make sure that everything is ready for when the mass downloads begin. This is to prevent people who are installing the release from having a bad experience, e.g., with missing documentation. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? That is exactly what I expect. In fact, I insist on it. And the reason I insist on it is because this is the documented procedure, and has been for at least 14 releases in the last 6 years, and most likely many before I became active. No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. You assumed so, posted, were told it was not correct, and cannot seem to accept that answer. I'm sorry, but it's the correct answer, and all the argumentation in the world will not change that answer. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Perhaps that's part of the preparatory steps. mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:16:59PM -0500, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. That build is intended to become the official release unless some last-minute showstopper problem is found. (Unlikely, but has happened before.) The build is being distributed in advance of the official announcement to make sure it is available on all mirrors at the moment the announcement is made. -- Insert your favourite quote here. Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? That is exactly what I expect. In fact, I insist on it. And the reason I insist on it is because this is the documented procedure, and has been for at least 14 releases in the last 6 years, and most likely many before I became active. I have been seeing the release is not official until... message since at least 3.4, so it's hardly new and is unlikely to ever go away. At least there has been no release announcement on slashdot when the ISOs were rolled but before the release was ready as has happened more than once in the past. (Knock on wood!) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly specified, right in the middle of the home page. Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I think you're just looking to nitpick. And, which is worse: 1. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP server, wait for the mirrors (FTP, CVS, SVN) to sync, then make the official announcement which includes a few days/weeks where the release is available but not official; or 2. tag the release branch, build the ISOs, upload to main FTP server, make the official announcement, user goes to their favourite/closest mirror, and can't access the release since it hasn't synced yet 3. tag the release[0], build the ISOs, upload then to main FTP and mirrors but restrict visibility[0], announce the release, make the build visible everywhere. At worse, fall-back on #2 with peer-to-peer distribution. If some steps in that process do not exist, create them. - Arnaud I think people would complain a hell of a lot more about 2 than they currently do about 1. Yes, people upgrading via source will see X.Y-RELEASE before it's officially announced on the website/mailing lists. Yes, people browsing ftp.freebsd.org will see X.Y-RELEASE ISOs before it's officially announced. Yes, some users will get confused by seeing X.Y-RELEASE available before the official annoucements. But, that's a lot better than making an annoucement and having users unable to use it since it's not available on their local mirrors. What's annoying, though, is that we have to go through this with every ... single ... minor ... release. It's not a hard concept, yet every time there's a new release, people get confused by it. Is there something that could be done to make it more streamlined/smoother? Maybe, maybe not. Depends. You'd have to want to join the RE team to find out more about the current release/mirror infrastructure. :) And then be willing to put in the time/effort to improve it. :D Does all of Arnaud's complaining and nit-picking constitute a request to volunteer to fix things? ;) -- Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. So, a pointless email. as is linimon@'s. 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation. ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly specified, right in the middle of the home page. Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I think you're just looking to nitpick. I did look the ftp before the website. It is an irrelevant source of information as I assume none of that stuff to be up-to-date. re@ has an unimpressive track record about information update. - Arnaud ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On 9 January 2012 21:06, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote: On 9 January 2012 18:16, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? Excellent! You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative, sentences that have no qualifying phrases. FWIW, this was more a sarcastic sentence pointing out that FreeBSD is currently officially distributing non-released build in a directory which might leads users to consider this is the official release, thus misleading them. So, a pointless email. as is linimon@'s. 9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email goes out. Everything up until that point is preparation. ok, I'm a stupid lazy user (obviously)... While browsing the ftp, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory. Do you expect me to consult freebsd-announce@, verify the signature of the announce, the hash of the ISOs, etc. to consider that 9.0 has been released ? No, I see 9.0 ISOs in a `releases' directory, I assume it has been released, whatever your spreading process is. Btw, none of the CHECKSUMS files are signed on the FTP. Have you checked the website? The latest supported release is clearly specified, right in the middle of the home page. Please don't tell me you'd look in ftp before checking the website. I think you're just looking to nitpick. I did look the ftp before the website. It is an irrelevant source of information as I assume none of that stuff to be up-to-date. re@ has an unimpressive track record about information update. Ridiculous assumption. I don't know who in re@ upset you so much, but you seriously need to get over it and stop trying to prove they're idiots. Constructive feedback is welcome, deliberately finding fault with strange things is not. Chris ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? I cannot find any announcement, especially on freebsd-announce@, [9.0TODO] has not been updated, there is no ISO image in [0], but there is in [3], dated from Jan 5th 2012 and `origin/releng/9.0' appeared in the . Thanks, - Arnaud [9.0TODO]: http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO [0]: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-amd64 [1]: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.0/ ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? I believe nearly all the release work is done and we are just waiting until the isos propagate to the mirrors before we announce the release. I could be totally off base though. -- Eitan Adler ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? 9.0 will, and only will, be released when an announcement is made on freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org, containing such things as verified checksums. Any information sent before that happens is not canonical. mcl ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hi, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? 9.0 will, and only will, be released when an announcement is made on freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org, containing such things as verified checksums. So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? - Arnaud ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote: Hi, On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote: On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 07:26:47PM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote: On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Arnaud Lacombe lacom...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote: Hello, Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, [...] Has 9.0 been released ? 9.0 will, and only will, be released when an announcement is made on freebsd-annou...@freebsd.org, containing such things as verified checksums. Correct. So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being 9.0 RELEASE (with checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually release images per-se ? s/providing/seeding/ Some of them have actually been replaced the last days. However it will only affect people running sysinstall on the DVD images. The installed result of the base wasn't changed, just a missing file added to the image as you could guess given there was no further commits to release/9.0.0 in SVN. There's also torrents to be started, yadda yadda yadda and some other people working really hard to get all things finished and loose ends together and if they are lucky in between all of this there is an hour or two for a weekend and them having a life. Be patient and wait for the mail maybe somewhen in the upcoming week. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions! It does not matter how good you are. It matters what good you do! ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 07:16 -0700, Peter wrote: Not for stable/9 [__FreeBSD_version 900500+: Sorry for the delay cleaning that up. It should be fixed as of r229748. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensm...@buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodor Geisel | signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
Hello,
Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources,
built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default
pointing at -current:
pkbsdpkg:#uname -a
FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r229599: Thu Jan 5
10:23:52 MST 2012 pe...@pkbsd.pk.pb:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
pkbsdpkg:#echo $PACKAGESITE
pkbsdpkg:#pkg_add -r test
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current/Latest/test.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current/Latest/test.tbz'
by URL
pkbsdpkg:#
pkbsdpkg:#pwd
/usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install
pkbsdpkg:#grep -R packages-9 *
add/main.c: { 90, 900499, /packages-9.0-release },
add/main.c: { 90, 999000, /packages-9-current },
???
On a fresh 9-release install works properly:
9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[15:10] igormolko: pkg_add -r test
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/Latest/test.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/Latest/test.tbz'
by URL
]Peter[
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Peter fb...@peterk.org wrote:
Hello,
Installed 9-RELEASE amd64, svn the latest stable/9 sources,
built/installed kernel/world and did pkg_add - It is still by default
pointing at -current:
pkbsdpkg:#uname -a
FreeBSD pkbsdpkg 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0 r229599: Thu Jan 5
10:23:52 MST 2012 pe...@pkbsd.pk.pb:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
amd64
pkbsdpkg:#echo $PACKAGESITE
pkbsdpkg:#pkg_add -r test
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current/Latest/test.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9-current/Latest/test.tbz'
by URL
pkbsdpkg:#
pkbsdpkg:#pwd
/usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install
pkbsdpkg:#grep -R packages-9 *
add/main.c: { 90, 900499, /packages-9.0-release },
add/main.c: { 90, 999000, /packages-9-current },
???
On a fresh 9-release install works properly:
9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[15:10] igormolko: pkg_add -r test
Error: Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/Latest/test.tbz:
File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.0-release/Latest/test.tbz'
by URL
svn up / c[v]sup your tree. It was recently merged/fixed by kensmith.
Thanks,
-Garrett
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
