On 05/11/2018 21:51, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> For you, but not for me.
>
Turns out I omitted the fact that I have WITH_RETPOLINE enabled, which
caused all this. emaste@ reported in PR 26 and committed r340650.
--
Charlie Li
Can't think of a witty .sigline today…
(This email address is
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 09:10:13PM -0500, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 03/11/2018 19:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Or rather, it is a middle of the valid instruction.
> > Next frame looks like it is process_irelocs(), if trusting the line
> > numbers. So most likely it is something related to
On 03/11/2018 19:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Or rather, it is a middle of the valid instruction.
> Next frame looks like it is process_irelocs(), if trusting the line
> numbers. So most likely it is something related to calling wrong
> relocator function, if anything.
>
> Perhaps you could
On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 12:43:34AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> what's an ifunc?
>
A special kind of relocation, controlled by the user code.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On 4 Nov 2018, at 08:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> what's an ifunc?
This is a GNU extension, an "indirect function". It allows you to
provide multiple different implementations of the same function, for
instance optimized for specific CPU types, and choose between them at
dynamic link time
what's an ifunc?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 06:59:02PM -0400, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 03/11/2018 11:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Some minimal amount of facts instead of guesses would be much more useful.
> >
> Yeah, being sleep deprived and hurried (on my end) certainly doesn't help.
> > What is the instruction
On 03/11/2018 11:29, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Some minimal amount of facts instead of guesses would be much more useful.
>
Yeah, being sleep deprived and hurried (on my end) certainly doesn't help.
> What is the instruction which faulted ? Disassemble the text at 0x2f5664.
> Regardless of
On Sat, Nov 03, 2018 at 08:52:16AM -0400, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 15:43, Charlie Li wrote:
> > On 01/11/2018 12:04, Brooks Davis wrote:
> >> Is this failure with devel/llvm70? It's currently missing the patch
> >> required to make this work. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17709 contains
On 01/11/2018 15:43, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 01/11/2018 12:04, Brooks Davis wrote:
>> Is this failure with devel/llvm70? It's currently missing the patch
>> required to make this work. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17709 contains
>> this patch among others. I'll see about getting it applied.
>>
>
On 01/11/2018 12:04, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Is this failure with devel/llvm70? It's currently missing the patch
> required to make this work. https://reviews.freebsd.org/D17709 contains
> this patch among others. I'll see about getting it applied.
>
Yes, devel/llvm70. Will build with your port
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:57:24AM -0400, Charlie Li wrote:
> On 29/10/2018 20:11, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > Author: kib
> > Date: Tue Oct 30 00:11:30 2018
> > New Revision: 339898
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339898
> >
> > Log:
> > Convert amd64_get/set_fs/gsbase to
On 29/10/2018 20:11, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> Author: kib
> Date: Tue Oct 30 00:11:30 2018
> New Revision: 339898
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/339898
>
> Log:
> Convert amd64_get/set_fs/gsbase to ifunc.
>
> Note that this is the first use of ifuncs in our userspace.
13 matches
Mail list logo
