> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:29:12AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> > >
> > > > The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> > > > that don't us
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:29:12AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> >
> > > The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> > > that don't usually get rebuil
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> > that don't usually get rebuilt in a buildworld/installworld run (like X11
> > tools like xterm)- and att
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> > that don't usually get rebuilt in a buildworld/installworld run (like X11
> > tools like xterm)- and att
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:23:23AM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
> that don't usually get rebuilt in a buildworld/installworld run (like X11
> tools like xterm)- and attempts to use such things yield:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root
It seems that libtermcap went away. Fine and dandy, okay...
The problem is that libtermcap.so, still hanging around, is used by things
that don't usually get rebuilt in a buildworld/installworld run (like X11
tools like xterm)- and attempts to use such things yield:
farrago.feral.com > xterm
/u