On 2015-07-18 18:18, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-07-18 18:13, Hoyoung Kim wrote:
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style like this:
paraWe have tried to keep the number of forward
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style like this:
paraWe have tried to keep the number of forward references in
the text to a minimum so that you can read this section of the
On 2015-07-18 18:13, Hoyoung Kim wrote:
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style like this:
paraWe have tried to keep the number of forward references in
the text to a minimum
Oh, I see. Thank you for reply :)
On 07/19/2015 07:23, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-07-18 18:18, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-07-18 18:13, Hoyoung Kim wrote:
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Hoyoung Kim wrote:
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style like this:
paraWe have tried to keep the number of forward
I got it. Thank you!
On 07/19/2015 08:08, Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2015, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 19 Jul 2015, Hoyoung Kim wrote:
Hello. I'm curious about indentation style.
Which is the proper one when dealing with FDP xml files?
The original FDP files follow the style like
install -C -o www-data -g www-data -m 444 imagelib/callouts/8.png
/usr/local/www/build/head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/imagelib/callouts
install -C -o www-data -g www-data -m 444 imagelib/callouts/9.png
